2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2018
DOI: 10.1109/cvpr.2018.00622
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Im2Flow: Motion Hallucination from Static Images for Action Recognition

Abstract: Existing methods to recognize actions in static images take the images at their face value, learning the appearances-objects, scenes, and body poses-that distinguish each action class. However, such models are deprived of the rich dynamic structure and motions that also define human activity. We propose an approach that hallucinates the unobserved future motion implied by a single snapshot to help static-image action recognition. The key idea is to learn a prior over short-term dynamics from thousands of unlab… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
104
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
(145 reference statements)
1
104
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the last years CNNs have successfully been trained to estimate the optical flow, including FlowNet [9,18], SpyNet [34] and PWC-Net [45], and achieve low End-Point Error (EPE) on challenging benchmarks, such as MPI Sintel [4] and KITTI 2015 [31]. Im2Flow work [13] also shows optical flow can be hallucinated from still images. Recent work however, shows that accuracy of optical flow does not strongly correlate with accuracy of video recognition [36].…”
Section: Motion Representation and Optical Flow Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the last years CNNs have successfully been trained to estimate the optical flow, including FlowNet [9,18], SpyNet [34] and PWC-Net [45], and achieve low End-Point Error (EPE) on challenging benchmarks, such as MPI Sintel [4] and KITTI 2015 [31]. Im2Flow work [13] also shows optical flow can be hallucinated from still images. Recent work however, shows that accuracy of optical flow does not strongly correlate with accuracy of video recognition [36].…”
Section: Motion Representation and Optical Flow Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, we minimize the per-pixel difference between the generated DMC and its corresponding optical flow. Following Im2Flow [13] which approximates flow from a single RGB image, we use the Mean Square Error (MSE) reconstruction loss L mse defined as:…”
Section: Optical Flow Reconstruction Lossmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some methods represent motion information only by RGB frame [13,14]. (Gao, Ruohan.et al, 2018) [15]considered that a static image can produce fake motion, thus predict optical flow fields through pre-trained Im2Flow network. [16]used to hallucinate optical flow images from videos.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optical flow prediction from a single image has been studied with various approaches. Supervised approaches using CNNs have also been proposed [Gao et al 2017;Walker et al 2015]. The point is how to prepare ground-truth flow fields for supervised learning.…”
Section: Optical Flow Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Training. A straightforward way for training the motion predictor is to minimize the difference between inferred and ground-truth flow fields, as done in [Gao et al 2017;Li et al 2018;Walker et al 2015]. Our motion predictor, in contrast, learns future flow fields in a self-supervised manner only from time-lapse videos that have no ground-truth.…”
Section: Motion Predictormentioning
confidence: 99%