2023
DOI: 10.1075/ld.00153.dru
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

(Im)politeness mismatches in the multi-dialogic pragmatics of telecinematic satire

Abstract: The paper addresses the problem of (im)politeness in light of mismatches between what we/others say and what we/others mean in a multi-dialogic search for meaning where humans integrate all their competence-in-performance and co-construct situated relationships in a more or less sustainable way. We examine how these processes occur by analyzing (im)politeness mismatches in telecinematic satire using dialogic speech act typology and methods of the Mixed Game Model to describe and explain the communicative meta-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 40 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Technology has recently complicated the politeness-satisfaction dance in the hospitality industry. Politely synthesised utterances are common in the context of many digital communication channels and automated service platforms (Druzhinin et al, 2024). Gone are those days, Chatbots, Virtual Assistants, AI-driven systems are helping the world deliver personalized and courteous interactions with the guests leading to an overall elevated guest experience.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Technology has recently complicated the politeness-satisfaction dance in the hospitality industry. Politely synthesised utterances are common in the context of many digital communication channels and automated service platforms (Druzhinin et al, 2024). Gone are those days, Chatbots, Virtual Assistants, AI-driven systems are helping the world deliver personalized and courteous interactions with the guests leading to an overall elevated guest experience.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%