2014
DOI: 10.1021/ci500467k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

iLOGP: A Simple, Robust, and Efficient Description of n-Octanol/Water Partition Coefficient for Drug Design Using the GB/SA Approach

Abstract: The n-octanol/water partition coefficient (log Po/w) is a key physicochemical parameter for drug discovery, design, and development. Here, we present a physics-based approach that shows a strong linear correlation between the computed solvation free energy in implicit solvents and the experimental log Po/w on a cleansed data set of more than 17,500 molecules. After internal validation by five-fold cross-validation and data randomization, the predictive power of the most interesting multiple linear model, based… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
325
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 616 publications
(332 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
2
325
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…XLOGP3, an atomistic method including corrective factors and knowledge-based library29; WLOGP, our own implementation of a purely atomistic method based on the fragmental system of Wildman and Crippen30; MLOGP, an archetype of topological method relying on a linear relationship with 13 molecular descriptors implemented from refs 31 and 32; SILICOS-IT, an hybrid method relying on 27 fragments and 7 topological descriptors (http://silicos-it.be.s3-website-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/software/filter-it/1.0.2/filter-it.html, accessed June 2016); and finally iLOGP, our in-house physics-based method relying on free energies of solvation in n -octanol and water calculated by the Generalized-Born and solvent accessible surface area (GB/SA) model. iLOGP was benchmarked on two drug or drug-like external sets and performed equally as or better than six well-established predictors16. The consensus log P o/w is the arithmetic mean of the values predicted by the five proposed methods.…”
Section: One-panel-per-molecule Outputmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…XLOGP3, an atomistic method including corrective factors and knowledge-based library29; WLOGP, our own implementation of a purely atomistic method based on the fragmental system of Wildman and Crippen30; MLOGP, an archetype of topological method relying on a linear relationship with 13 molecular descriptors implemented from refs 31 and 32; SILICOS-IT, an hybrid method relying on 27 fragments and 7 topological descriptors (http://silicos-it.be.s3-website-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/software/filter-it/1.0.2/filter-it.html, accessed June 2016); and finally iLOGP, our in-house physics-based method relying on free energies of solvation in n -octanol and water calculated by the Generalized-Born and solvent accessible surface area (GB/SA) model. iLOGP was benchmarked on two drug or drug-like external sets and performed equally as or better than six well-established predictors16. The consensus log P o/w is the arithmetic mean of the values predicted by the five proposed methods.…”
Section: One-panel-per-molecule Outputmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…pk-CSM14 and admetSAR15) and apart from unique access to proficient methods (e.g. iLOGP16 or the BOILED-Egg17), SwissADME strong points are, non-exhaustively: different input methods, computation for multiple molecules, and the possibility to display, save and share results per individual molecule or through global intuitive and interactive graphs. Finally, SwissADME is integrated in the SwissDrugDesign workspace.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the accuracy seems to be insufficient when compared to the recently reported methods such as QSPR modeling with intramolecular interaction parameters [13] and the hybrid GB/SA model [15]. To address the dependence of the LogP prediction results on the contents of the training and test sets, we repeated the optimization of the atomic solvation parameters and the calculation of molecular LogP values using the two additional training/test set combinations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Very recently, Daina et al. developed a rigorous method for predicting LogP by combining the generalized Born and solvent accessible surface area models [15], which was referred to as iLogP method. Besides the high accuracy in estimating the molecular LogP values, iLogP method was also found to be adequate for coping with a large number of molecules in reasonably short time frame despite the requirement for computing various molecular descriptors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The protein and ligand were docked with iGEMDOCK and Autodock Vina [24], the results were retrieved on the basis of energy values, Van der Waals force, binding affinity between protein and ligand. The SAR molecules were generated with the help of SWISS ADME [25][26][27] online tool. In a study by Jeyam et al showed that a good interaction between 1,3 β glucan synthase with 20 phytoconstituents and the inhibition of 1,3 β glucan synthase was better than echinocandins [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%