2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.lithos.2004.05.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ilmenite, magnetite, and peraluminous Mesoproterozoic anorogenic granites of Laurentia and Baltica

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
69
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 150 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
8
69
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…basin formation) in Laurentia are very similar to those observed in Fennoscandia (e.g. Emslie 1978;Windley 1993;Gower and Tucker 1994;Andersson and Morrison 2005), and lend further support to a contiguous active Baltica-Laurentia margin before the Sveconorwegian orogeny (e.g. Romer 1996;Karlstrom et al 2001;.…”
Section: The Onset Of Magmatism Of the Danopolonian Eventsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…basin formation) in Laurentia are very similar to those observed in Fennoscandia (e.g. Emslie 1978;Windley 1993;Gower and Tucker 1994;Andersson and Morrison 2005), and lend further support to a contiguous active Baltica-Laurentia margin before the Sveconorwegian orogeny (e.g. Romer 1996;Karlstrom et al 2001;.…”
Section: The Onset Of Magmatism Of the Danopolonian Eventsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Depressed v RMS levels between 1.5 and 1.0 Ga correlate with emplacement of the anorthosite-mangerite-charnockite-A type granite (AMCG) suite unique to Mesoproterozoic and Early Neoproterozoic times (Anderson and Morrison, 2005). Subcrustal temperatures need to reach 1200e1300 C to produce anorthositic magmas and must then be sustained to permit delivery to the upper crust (Vigneresse, 2005); comprehensive weakening of the crust is required to emplace these plutons as large, thin and widely-spaced plutons (Bridgwater et al, 1974).…”
Section: Prolonged V Rms Slowdown and Mesoproterozoic Anorogenic Magmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A-type granites and rhyolites are commonly interpreted to be the result of partial melting of continental crust (e.g., Frindt et al 2004, Rämö andHaapala 1995;Patiño Douce 1997;Collins et al 1982;Leeman 1982: Anderson andMorrison 2005;Hughes and McCurry 2002;Christiansen et al 1986;King et al 2001). However, where the isotopic contrast between old crust and mantle is large, it has been argued that a significant percentage (as high as 100%) of the silicic magmas must have come from the mantle (e.g., Bonin 2005;Ewart et al 2004).…”
Section: Production Of Rhyolite By Partial Melting Of Continental Crustmentioning
confidence: 99%