1987
DOI: 10.1007/bf02577994
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Illustrative cases in pericardial effusion misdetection: Correlation of echocardiography and CT

Abstract: Eight equivocal two-dimensional echocardiograms with concurrent CT scans were evaluated to identify potential pitfalls in pericardial effusion detection. By echocardiography, two pleural effusions were felt to be pericardial, two hemopericardiums were interpreted as normal myocardium, three loculated pericardial effusions were not seen or were misinterpreted as other mediastinal collections, and one epicardial lipoma was called a pericardial effusion. When the clinical suspicion for pericardial effusion does n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Occasionally, this differentiation can be difficult, particularly in cases of small pericardial collections (27,28).…”
Section: Computed Tomographymentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Occasionally, this differentiation can be difficult, particularly in cases of small pericardial collections (27,28).…”
Section: Computed Tomographymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Other limitations include the difficulty of identifying clotting or clots within the pericardium at echocardiography as well as differentiation of small fluid collections from pericardial thickening, differentiation of fluid in the anterior and posterior spaces around the heart from epicardial fat, and identification of loculations in complex pericardial collections (8,26,27).…”
Section: Computed Tomographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 Therefore, in suspected cases, CT, PET/CT, or magnetic resonance imaging should be performed despite normal echocardiographic findings. 10 Computed tomography can detect, characterise, and assess the extent of pericardial lesions. It provides a larger field of view than transthoracic echocardiography.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, problems limiting echocardiography in evaluating pericardial pathology are many, whereas CT can readily detect pericardial abnormalities with greater specificity as well as defining anatomic boundaries between intracardiac and extracardiac structures [8]. Thus, CT should be the study of choice when clinical suspicion of pericardial disease does not correlate with echocardiographic findings and routine closure of the esophageal hiatus is recommended after transhiatal esophagectomy P I .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%