2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemphys.2009.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Illustration of all species and all microspecies involved in full protonation steps of spermine and determination of corresponding most abundant and most stable conformers, a gas phase theoretical study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
22
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
22
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As we mentioned above, the most stable complex, [Cu(tren)] 21 , has smallest proton macroaffinity and least stable one, [Cu(ppb)] 21 , has greatest proton macroaffinity. Obviously, if there is a good correlation between the proton macroaffinity of [M(L)] 21 complexes with their formation constants, then we Fig. 4).…”
Section: Proton Affinities and Formation Constantsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…As we mentioned above, the most stable complex, [Cu(tren)] 21 , has smallest proton macroaffinity and least stable one, [Cu(ppb)] 21 , has greatest proton macroaffinity. Obviously, if there is a good correlation between the proton macroaffinity of [M(L)] 21 complexes with their formation constants, then we Fig. 4).…”
Section: Proton Affinities and Formation Constantsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…18,19,20,39 2. As can be seen in Table 1, the smallest proton macroaffinity (and also macrobasicity) is calculated for the [Cu(tren)] 21 . In fact, the order of the first proton macroaffinity and macrobasicity for the Cu 21 21 (i.e., completely opposite to the observed trend for their proton macroaffinity and macrobasicity).…”
Section: Proton Affinities and Formation Constantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations