2002
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-002-1185-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Illusions in action: consequences of inconsistent processing of spatial attributes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
100
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
7
100
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Gonzalez et al (2006) found a larger illusion eVect on the peak grip aperture during precision grasping movements performed with the left hand, regardless of the subject's handedness. Milner and Goodale (2006) have argued that this Wnding challenges the idea of the presence of dissociation between position and extent, rather than between perception and action, as an explanation for the illusion eVects on various tasks Brenner 1999, 2001;Smeets et al 2002). As argued in the introduction, the results of Gonzalez et al (2006) can easily be explained by the dissociation between position and extent.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Gonzalez et al (2006) found a larger illusion eVect on the peak grip aperture during precision grasping movements performed with the left hand, regardless of the subject's handedness. Milner and Goodale (2006) have argued that this Wnding challenges the idea of the presence of dissociation between position and extent, rather than between perception and action, as an explanation for the illusion eVects on various tasks Brenner 1999, 2001;Smeets et al 2002). As argued in the introduction, the results of Gonzalez et al (2006) can easily be explained by the dissociation between position and extent.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…However, the methods used are not all that different from those used in other research for the study of illusions (Amazeen & DaSilva, 2005) and have advantages over the use of a fingers posture for size estimates (e.g., Heller et al, 1997;Heller, Joyner, & Dan-Fodio, 1993;Smeets, Brenner, de Grave, & Cuijpers, 2002). The rulers were in different spatial locations than the extents being judged, and conceivably, this could prompt systematic errors.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This raises the question whether the effects of pictorial illusions are fundamentally different from visual deformations of shape. We do not think so: to explain the effects of the orientation illusion, it is sufficient to assume that the planned grip orientation and grip locations do not have to be mutually consistent (Smeets et al 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neurological evidence that perceiving shapes veridically is not crucial for grasping them correctly has been taken as a support for grasping having access to different, veridical, visual information about the object (Goodale et al 1994;Goodale and Milner 1992). Since different aspects of the visual information do not have to be mutually consistent (Smeets et al 2002), any difference between performance on two tasks could be explained by assuming that different aspects of the visual information are used for the two tasks. For example, if grasping is accomplished by moving the fingertips to suitable locations on the target's surface then the distance between these points is irrelevant so that an illusion of size should have no effect (Smeets and Brenner 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation