2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2016.05.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Illumination-invariant image matching for autonomous UAV localisation based on optical sensing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Geometric constraints based on pixel distance to correct matches are employed for mismatch removal at repetitive image regions. Considering variation of illumination between UAV and satellite images, illuminationinvariant image matching is proposed based on phase correlation to match the on-board UAV image sequences to a pre-installed reference satellite images for UAV localization and navigation [84].…”
Section: Low-altitude Uav Image Matchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geometric constraints based on pixel distance to correct matches are employed for mismatch removal at repetitive image regions. Considering variation of illumination between UAV and satellite images, illuminationinvariant image matching is proposed based on phase correlation to match the on-board UAV image sequences to a pre-installed reference satellite images for UAV localization and navigation [84].…”
Section: Low-altitude Uav Image Matchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the frequency domain, the most popular similarity measure is phase correlation (PC), which can quickly estimate the translations between images based on the Fourier shift theorem (Bracewell and Bracewell, 1986). Nowadays, PC has been extended to account for scale and rotation changes (Reddy and Chatterji, 1996), and also applied to remote sensing image registration (Wan et al, 2016;Wan et al, 2015). Compared with the spatial measures, its main advantage is the high computational efficiency (Wong and Orchard, 2008).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the simulated experiments, the normalized correlation coefficient (NCC), 48,49 coefficient of determination (R 2 ), root mean square error (RMSE), SNR, and PSNR 50 between the smoothed spectrum and standard vegetation spectrum were calculated to evaluate the denoising results. For measured canopy spectra of winter wheat, NCC was used to estimate the waveform similarity of the spectra before and after denoising, to assess the results qualitatively, whereas wheat biophysical and biochemical parameters were retrieved using different hyperspectral vegetation indices derived from denoised spectra to quantitatively assess the results.…”
Section: Evaluation Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%