Illuminating the Path to Grand Pari(s): Architecture and Urban Transformation in an Era of Neoliberalization

Abstract

This article examines the architectural exhibition associated with the large-scale Grand Paris urban development project initiated in 2007 by French President Nicolas Sarkozy. Through a close examination of the exhibition, I argue that imaginative representation is crucial to urban transformation, here acting to justify and naturalize neoliberal reforms. While the ten international teams of architects tasked with imagining twenty-first century Paris presented sometimes radical scenarios, the architectural proposals are also used by the state to secure a sense of regional coherence, to reaffirm the imperative of economic growth, and to deny broad sociospatial conflict. The futural aspect of speculative regional development is redoubled in the prospective architectural visions, thus solidifying the dominance of a marketized mode of urbanization. While this cooption of architectural designs emerges from the unique circumstances of contemporary Paris, it also speaks to the broader promise and limits of imaginative urbanism and large-scale architectural intervention.

Development as a Battlefield

“…At the urban level, neo-liberal or 'entrepreneurial' development represents a mode of socio-economic regulation that incentivises market agents to invest, develop, and create workplaces, infrastructure, and social and spatial amenities (Harvey, 1989;Swyngedouw et al, 2002;Enright, 2014). The preliminary push to urban entrepreneurialism came in the 1970s, as municipalities in the us and uk faced bankruptcy due to the severe cutbacks of federal aid (Tasan-Kok, 2008;Theodore et al, 2011).…”

Resisting Neo-Liberal Skylines: Social Mobilisations and Entrepreneurial Urban Development in Tel Aviv

“…Neo-liberalisation is a shorthand description of processes that deepen marketoriented behaviours, institutions and regulations (Brenner et al, 2010). At the urban level, neo-liberal or 'entrepreneurial' development represents a mode of socio-economic regulation that incentivises market agents to invest, develop, and create workplaces, infrastructure, and social and spatial amenities (Harvey, 1989;Swyngedouw et al, 2002;Enright, 2014). The preliminary push to urban entrepreneurialism came in the 1970s, as municipalities in the us and uk faced bankruptcy due to the severe cutbacks of federal aid (Tasan-Kok, 2008;Theodore et al, 2011).…”

Interrogating Madrid's “Slum of Shame”: Urban Expansion, Race, and Place-Based Activisms in the Cañada Real Galiana

“…Writing on the Grand Pari(s) project, another European master plan with similar ambitions, Enright points to “an increasingly prevalent trend of mega‐project‐based urban development that de‐democratizes city building and entrenches and reproduces social and spatial injustices” (Enright :384). Madrid's grand schemes follow this trend closely.…”