2009
DOI: 10.1515/cclm.2009.106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Illumina DNA test panel-based genotyping of whole genome amplified-DNA extracted from hair samples: performance and agreement with genotyping results from genomic DNA from buccal cells

Abstract: Results suggest that WGA-DNA obtained from hair can produce excellent genotyping call rates and show relatively good SNP concordance with results from buccal cell DNA using high-throughput technology. DNA quantity obtained from hair samples is a crucial determinant of genotyping performance. Larger studies are needed to examine the utility of hair DNA with different genotyping platforms.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 2 , 3 , 11 , 30 , 31 It was interesting to find that ATS were comparable to blood and other tissue samples that, with the exception of FFPE, are historically considered ideal specimens. The ease of collection, storage, and lower cost of sample shipment and extraction make ATS a valuable resource to stand alone or complement other specimens that may be limited in quality, 32 , 33 scope, 34 , 35 or yield 36 , 37 (see Supplemental Table S1 at http://jmd.amjpathol.org ). Depending on the research question, availability, or purpose, several different tissues may need to be analyzed in parallel to obtain an accurate genomic profile.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 2 , 3 , 11 , 30 , 31 It was interesting to find that ATS were comparable to blood and other tissue samples that, with the exception of FFPE, are historically considered ideal specimens. The ease of collection, storage, and lower cost of sample shipment and extraction make ATS a valuable resource to stand alone or complement other specimens that may be limited in quality, 32 , 33 scope, 34 , 35 or yield 36 , 37 (see Supplemental Table S1 at http://jmd.amjpathol.org ). Depending on the research question, availability, or purpose, several different tissues may need to be analyzed in parallel to obtain an accurate genomic profile.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Illumina platform (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) has proven reliable and efficient for a number of high-throughput genotyping applications using DNA extracted from several sources, [3-9]. VeraCode and BeadArray technologies are used with the GoldenGate assay (Illumina) developed for simultaneous determination of between 96 and 384 (VeraCode) and 96 and 1,536 (BeadArray) variants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, buccal cell sample collection is minimally invasive, allowing study subjects to collect their sample from home and send it back via the mail, which can maximize participation when the study population is geographically dispersed. [1][2][3][4][5][6] However, inadequate DNA yield, [3][4][5][6] the presence of bacterial DNA, 7 and the need to possibly store samples for long periods prior to use may compromise the utility of buccal cell samples for GWAS. Re-sampling in aging cohorts to augment DNA concentrations may not be an option because of limited resources, loss to follow up, or death of cohort members.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%