2012
DOI: 10.1177/1363459312460702
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ills from the womb? A critical examination of clinical guidelines for obesity in pregnancy

Abstract: In this article, we critically examine the clinical guidelines for obesity in pregnancy put forth by the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (SOGC) that are underpinned by the rules of Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM), a system of ranking knowledge that promises to provide unbiased evidence about the effectiveness of treatments. While the SOGC guidelines are intended to direct health practitioners on 'best practice' as they address pregnancy weight gain with clients in the clinical context, we q… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Critical scholars writing from diverse epistemological positions have questioned both the "problem" of pregnancy fatness and the proposed solutions (Furber and McGowan, 2011;Lindhardt et al, 2013;Mulherin et al, 2013;DeJoy and Bittner, 2015). For scholars writing from a poststructural epistemological frame, contemporary knowledge about pregnancy fatness does not represent an objective truth or reality but rather historically and socially specific "truths, " constituted from multiple dominant gendered, biomedical, and neoliberal discourses about health, fatness, reproduction and mothering (Jette, 2006;Tolwinski, 2010;McNaughton, 2011;Warin et al, 2011Warin et al, , 2012Jette and Rail, 2013;Parker, 2014;Parker and Pausé, 2018). Dominant discourses, from a poststructural perspective, are the practices of knowledge production which, through existing power relations, come to constitute truth and meaning, as well as producing a range of subject positions or ways of being in the world (Bacchi and Bonham, 2014, p. 174).…”
Section: Pregnancy Fatness As Dominant Discoursementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Critical scholars writing from diverse epistemological positions have questioned both the "problem" of pregnancy fatness and the proposed solutions (Furber and McGowan, 2011;Lindhardt et al, 2013;Mulherin et al, 2013;DeJoy and Bittner, 2015). For scholars writing from a poststructural epistemological frame, contemporary knowledge about pregnancy fatness does not represent an objective truth or reality but rather historically and socially specific "truths, " constituted from multiple dominant gendered, biomedical, and neoliberal discourses about health, fatness, reproduction and mothering (Jette, 2006;Tolwinski, 2010;McNaughton, 2011;Warin et al, 2011Warin et al, , 2012Jette and Rail, 2013;Parker, 2014;Parker and Pausé, 2018). Dominant discourses, from a poststructural perspective, are the practices of knowledge production which, through existing power relations, come to constitute truth and meaning, as well as producing a range of subject positions or ways of being in the world (Bacchi and Bonham, 2014, p. 174).…”
Section: Pregnancy Fatness As Dominant Discoursementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taken Thus, we tend to accept them as objective truth or reality, allowing them to become deeply 387 embedded in our cultural discourses and practices (Jette & Rail, 2012). 388…”
Section: Participants 311mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prozen & Krajnc (2019) also acknowledged that intervention was applied to areas going over and beyond medical imperialism. Furthermore, studies have created an entire discourse questioning the biomedical problem of obesity and the unethical approach of blaming individuals for medicalisation posited by the current approach (Jette, and Rail, 2013;Parker, & Pausé, 2018;Ralston et al, 2018;Toomath, 2016;Tolwinski, 2010;Ward & McPhail, 2019). Midwives in this study confirm that such alternative views remain neglected in favour of the mainstream dominant medicalised view.…”
Section: Medicalisation Of Obesitysupporting
confidence: 52%