Illness‐related impoverishment in rural South Africa: Why does social protection work for some households but not others?

Abstract

Illness is a major risk to people's livelihoods in resource-poor settings, particularly where there are rising levels of chronic illness. Measures that improve access to treatment are increasingly seen as a vital form of social protection for vulnerable households, and central to the achievement of the Millennium Development Goals. International attention is also focussed on cash transfers as a strand of social protection, and on the potential complementarities between free health care and cash transfers in assisting vulnerable people to cope with illness-related shocks. South Africa provides an interesting setting to examine how households are accessing social protection measures because the government has removed some user fees, implemented hospital-level exemptions and extended cash transfers including the non-contributory pension and child support grant. This paper presents findings from household research in rural South Africa. Qualitative and quantitative methods were used to assess the links between illness-related costs and impoverishment over time, the protection effects of free health services, cash transfers and social networks, and the factors influencing access to these three forms of social protection. Different degrees of success in drawing on these resources affected capacity to cope with illnesses and made a considerable difference to whether households sustained their livelihoods, struggled or declined. Cash transfers combined well with free health care to build resilience among some households. However, households without access to at least two strands of the social protection net were impoverished by the direct and indirect costs of long-term illnesses. The implications for policies on improving the uptake and coverage of social protection measures are discussed. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Exploring antiretroviral treatment adherence in an urban setting in South Africa

“…10 Although a disability grant provided temporary support for those who were clinically ill, and contributed substantially to improving nutritional status, 11,12 some families fall through the social security net resulting in insufficient food to meet their nutritional needs. 13 For such households, regular food parcels or a means-tested chronic illness grant is vital to ensuring high adherence levels.…”

Towards Universal Coverage: Examining Costs of Illness, Payment, and Coping Strategies to Different Population Groups in Southeast Nigeria

“…Also, the most poor households spent the least on treatment, which may erroneously imply that they are at a lower risk of suffering deprivations because ill health. Although some authors have opined that other factors, such as asset base 9 and availability of social networks, 34 play a role in determining if a household will be impoverished or not by health expenditures, this study, however, did not estimate if these costs were impoverishing to households. The high levels of expenditures, especially for peri-urban communities, are worsened by the finding that the dominant payment mechanism was OOP spending, which is a regressive form of financing healthcare.…”

A descriptive qualitative study of childhood cancer challenges in South Africa: Thematic analysis of 68 photovoice contributions

“…36 The financial burden of additional unavoidable costs 26 incurred in the process of accessing cancer care can create unmanageable financial pressures 20,46 which can contribute to the risk of treatment abandonment. 36,46 Financial assistance was inadequate for many families coping with childhood cancer, and financial aid and labour legislation to address threats to employment or compassionate leave for parents are needed.…”