Illness perceptions and their association with 2 year functional status and change in patients with hand osteoarthritis

Damman, W.; Liu, Rani; Kaptein, Ad A.; Evers, Andrea W M; Middendorp, Henriët van; Rosendaal, Frits R.; Kloppenburg, Margreet

doi:10.1093/rheumatology/key231

Cited by 15 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 40 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The mental health screening tool explained a substantial part of the variance in pain and hand function at baseline and 3 months. This highlights, in line with other studies [3-5, 8, 9, 12, 14-16, 18, 19, 25, 28, 30, 31, 33, 35, 36], the importance of mental health and its relation to treatment decisions and outcomes. The models with only the screening tool items performed nearly as well as the models using the full mental health measures (that is, the entire PCS, PHQ-4, and B-IPQ), which further substantiates the validity of our tool.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 90%

“…In musculoskeletal healthcare, patient mental health has gained attention in recent years. Numerous studies have demonstrated that mental health factors influence symptoms, outcomes, and treatment choices [3-5, 8, 9, 12, 14-16, 18, 19, 25, 28, 30, 31, 33, 35, 36]. For example, patients with thumb-base osteoarthritis scheduled for surgery have worse psychologic profiles than their nonsurgical counterparts [37], suggesting that domains of mental health play an important role in choosing between surgical and nonsurgical treatment.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The Ultrashort Mental Health Screening Tool Is a Valid and Reliable Measure With Added Value to Support Decision-making

Wouters,

de Ridder,

Slijper

et al. 2023

Clin Orthop Relat Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Mental health influences symptoms, outcomes, and decision-making in musculoskeletal healthcare. Implementing measures of mental health in clinical practice can be challenging. An ultrashort screening tool for mental health with a low burden is currently unavailable but could be used as a conversation starter, expectation management tool, or decision support tool. Questions/purposes (1) Which items of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-4), and Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (B-IPQ) are the most discriminative and yield a high correlation with the total scores of these questionnaires? (2) What is the construct validity and added clinical value (explained variance for pain and hand function) of an ultrashort four-item mental health screening tool? (3) What is the test-retest reliability of the screening tool? (4) What is the response time for the ultrashort screening tool?Each author certifies that there are no funding or commercial associations (consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article related to the author or any immediate family members. All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request. Ethical approval for this study was obtained from Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 90%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Ultrashort Mental Health Screening Tool Is a Valid and Reliable Measure With Added Value to Support Decision-making

Wouters,

de Ridder,

Slijper

et al. 2023

Clin Orthop Relat Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) generally play a key role when assessing arthritic conditions such as pain [15], physical disability [16], psychiatric disturbance [17], aesthetic problems [18,19] and poor health-related quality of life [12,13]. While a growing number of instruments are available and cover a wide range of the health sciences, we must use those most appropriate to the clinical setting [20,21].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cross-cultural translation, adaptation and validation of a Japanese version of the functional index for hand osteoarthritis (J-FIHOA)

Nakagawa

Kurimoto

Maheu

et al. 2020

BMC Musculoskelet Disord

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Hand osteoarthritis (OA) has a wide spectrum of clinical presentations and physical function is one of the core domains where patients suffer. The Functional Index for Hand Osteoarthritis (FIHOA) is a leading assessment tool for hand OA-related functional impairment. Our objective was to make a Japanese version of FIHOA (J-FIHOA) and validate it among Japanese hand OA patients. Methods Forward and backward translation processes were completed to create a culturally adapted J-FIHOA. A prospective, observational multicenter study was undertaken for the validation process. Seventeen collaborating hospitals recruited Japanese hand OA patients who met the American College of Rheumatology criteria. A medical record review and responses to the following patient-rated questionnaires were collected: J-FIHOA, Hand20, Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), numerical rating scale for pain (NRS pain) and Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36). We explored the structure of J-FIHOA using factor analysis. Cronbach’s alpha coefficients and item-total correlations were calculated. Correlations between J-FIHOA and other questionnaires were evaluated for construct validity. Participants in clinically stable conditions repeated J-FIHOA at a one- to two-week interval to assess test-retest reliability. To evaluate responsiveness, symptomatic patients who started new pharmacological treatments had a 1-month follow-up visit and completed the questionnaires twice. Effect size (ES) and standardized response mean (SRM) were calculated with pre- and post-treatment data sets. We assessed responsiveness, comparing ES and SRM of J-FIHOA with other questionnaires (construct approach). Results A total of 210 patients participated. J-FIHOA had unidimensional structure. Cronbach’s alphas (0.914 among females and 0.929 among males) and item-total correlations (range, 0.508 to 0.881) revealed high internal consistency. Hand20, which measures upper extremity disability, was strongly correlated with J-FIHOA (r = 0.82) while the mental and role-social components of SF-36 showed no correlations (r = − 0.24 and − 0.26, respectively). Intraclass correlation coefficient for test-retest reliability was 0.83 and satisfactory. J-FIHOA showed the highest ES and SRM (− 0.68 and − 0.62, respectively) among all questionnaires, except for NRS pain. Conclusions Our results showed J-FIHOA had good measurement properties to assess physical function in Japanese hand OA patients both for ambulatory follow-up in clinical practice, and clinical research and therapeutic trials.

show abstract

“…Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) generally play a key role when assessing arthritic conditions such as pain [15], physical dysfunction [16], psychiatric disturbance [17], aesthetic problems [18,19] and poor health-related quality of life [12,13]. While a growing number of instruments are available and cover a wide range of the health sciences, we must use those most appropriate to the clinical setting [20,21].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cross-cultural translation, adaptation and validation of a Japanese version of the Functional Index for Hand Osteoarthritis (J-FIHOA)

Nakagawa

Kurimoto

Maheu

et al. 2020

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Hand osteoarthritis (OA) has a wide spectrum of clinical presentations and physical function is one of the core domains where patients suffer. The Functional Index for Hand Osteoarthritis (FIHOA) is a leading assessment tool for hand dysfunction. Our objective was to make a Japanese version of FIHOA (J-FIHOA) and validate it among Japanese hand OA patients. Methods: Forward and backward translation processes were completed to create a culturally adapted J-FIHOA. A prospective, observational multicenter study was undertaken for the validation process. Seventeen collaborating hospitals recruited Japanese hand OA patients who met the American College of Rheumatology criteria. A medical record review and responses to the following patient-rated questionnaires were collected: J-FIHOA, Hand20, Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), numerical rating scale for pain (NRS pain) and Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36). We explored the structure of J-FIHOA using factor analysis. Cronbach’s alpha coefficients and item-total correlations were calculated. Correlations between J-FIHOA and other questionnaires were evaluated for construct validity. Participants in clinically stable conditions repeated J-FIHOA at a one- to two-week interval to assess test-retest reliability. To evaluate responsiveness, symptomatic patients who started new pharmacological treatments had a 1-month follow-up visit and completed the questionnaires twice. Effect size (ES) and standardized response mean (SRM) were calculated with pre- and post-treatment data sets. We assessed responsiveness, comparing ES and SRM of J-FIHOA with other questionnaires (construct approach). Results: A total of 210 patients participated. J-FIHOA had unidimensional structure. Cronbach’s alphas (0.914 among females and 0.929 among males) and item-total correlations (range, 0.508 to 0.881) revealed high internal consistency. Hand20, which measures upper extremity disability, was strongly correlated with J-FIHOA (r=0.82) while the mental and role-social component of SF-36 showed no correlations (r=−0.24 and −0.26, respectively). Intraclass correlation coefficient for test-retest reliability was 0.83 and satisfactory. J-FIHOA showed the highest ES and SRM (−0.68 and −0.62, respectively) among all questionnaires, except for NRS pain. Conclusions: Our results showed J-FIHOA had good measurement properties to assess physical dysfunction in Japanese patients both for ambulatory follow-up in clinical practice, and clinical research and therapeutic trials.

show abstract

Illness perceptions and their association with 2 year functional status and change in patients with hand osteoarthritis

Abstract: Illness perceptions seemed to be implicated in disability and its progression. Our results suggest that interventions could focus on improving baseline disability, potentially using illness perceptions to accomplish this goal.

Cited by 15 publications

References 40 publications

The Ultrashort Mental Health Screening Tool Is a Valid and Reliable Measure With Added Value to Support Decision-making

The Ultrashort Mental Health Screening Tool Is a Valid and Reliable Measure With Added Value to Support Decision-making

Cross-cultural translation, adaptation and validation of a Japanese version of the functional index for hand osteoarthritis (J-FIHOA)

Cross-cultural translation, adaptation and validation of a Japanese version of the Functional Index for Hand Osteoarthritis (J-FIHOA)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About