2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2011.03298.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Illness perceptions and glycaemic control in diabetes: a systematic review with meta‐analysis

Abstract: Some Illness Perception Questionnaire dimensions had small significant associations with HbA(1c) , although the direction of these associations remains unclear. There was also tentative evidence that illness perceptions can be positively changed through targeted intervention and that these changes may also impact on glycaemic control. Future research could benefit from tailoring intervention content to perceptions that are most highly associated with HbA(1c).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

25
132
2
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 143 publications
(169 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(94 reference statements)
25
132
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…It was previously thought that treatment control has not been consistently supported in the literature, as relates to glycemic control, due to a lack of specification of treatment types (Mc Sharry et al, 2011), such as those using insulin and/or oral medications or diet alone; however, the present sample are all using insulin or daily injected diabetes medication, significantly minimizing this problem. It may be that the overall poor health of this sample, as evidenced by significant medical complications and poor glycemic control, makes testing associations with glycemic control difficult.…”
Section: Hypothesis 3 (H3): Beliefs Reflecting Greater Illness Contromentioning
confidence: 67%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It was previously thought that treatment control has not been consistently supported in the literature, as relates to glycemic control, due to a lack of specification of treatment types (Mc Sharry et al, 2011), such as those using insulin and/or oral medications or diet alone; however, the present sample are all using insulin or daily injected diabetes medication, significantly minimizing this problem. It may be that the overall poor health of this sample, as evidenced by significant medical complications and poor glycemic control, makes testing associations with glycemic control difficult.…”
Section: Hypothesis 3 (H3): Beliefs Reflecting Greater Illness Contromentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Prior research supports a two-dimension conceptualization, reflecting the cure and control as separate constructs. While personal control has been found to be negatively associated with glycemic control (R 2 = -0.12), treatment control has not been consistently supported in the literature as related to glycemic control; this is possibly due to a lack of specification of treatments or not comparing those with using different treatment strategies (Mc Sharry et al, 2011 (Lalic et al, 2012).…”
Section: Controllabilitymentioning
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Moss-Morris et al, 2002, Lynch et al, 2011 and have been used to demonstrate an association between diabetes representations and glycated haemoglobin (HbA 1c ) an objective measure of blood glucose control (Mc Sharry et al, 2011). There is also a body of literature describing the assessment of the emotional aspects of living with diabetes through widely used and validated measures such as the Problem Areas in Diabetes scale (Polonsky et al, 1995) and the Diabetes Distress Scale (Polonsky et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%