2016
DOI: 10.1177/1049732316645319
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Illness Narratives of African Americans Living With Coronary Heart Disease

Abstract: How African American men and women respond to and manage living with coronary heart disease (CHD) is not well understood despite the well-documented disproportionate burden of CHD and its complications among African Americans in the United States. Through a critical interactionist perspective, we explore illness experiences of African Americans living with CHD and describe a broad range of micro-, meso-, and macro-contextual factors that influence their illness experiences. For participants in this study, CHD … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We therefore saw the value of preserving and presenting this data as intact narratives. Although this differs from the traditional method of presenting qualitative findings, it better aligns with strengths-based [4] and critical interactionist methodologies [37]. These methodologies center the experience and worldview of the participants, and prioritize the speakers/storytellers, rather than the researchers, in defining the meaning and purpose of the information they share, and the ways in which key issues are interconnected [4,[13][14][15]37] (see S3 Appendix for more details on these methodologies).…”
Section: Data Collection and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We therefore saw the value of preserving and presenting this data as intact narratives. Although this differs from the traditional method of presenting qualitative findings, it better aligns with strengths-based [4] and critical interactionist methodologies [37]. These methodologies center the experience and worldview of the participants, and prioritize the speakers/storytellers, rather than the researchers, in defining the meaning and purpose of the information they share, and the ways in which key issues are interconnected [4,[13][14][15]37] (see S3 Appendix for more details on these methodologies).…”
Section: Data Collection and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cultural capital of the provider and the patient impact the perceptions of quality care and, more importantly, can facilitate or impede authentic engagement between patients and their healthcare providers (Chang et al, 2016;Dubbin et al, 2013;Shim, 2010). Lastly, our recent work (Dubbin et al, 2017) has shown that African-Americans perceive categories of illness, such as coronary heart disease and diabetes, as products of ongoing racial and socio-structural dynamics that create and maintain health burdens, as opposed to lifestyle diseases where the ultimate culprits are their personal health behaviors and lack of healthy choices. A tension between the effectiveness of personal health behaviors and living with illness was described by AfricanAmericans when communicating with their healthcare providers about their care.…”
Section: Background and Significancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the strength of qualitative research to uncover complex social phenomenon such as health disparities (Jones, Trivedi, & Ayanian, 2010; Sinding, 2010; Wheatley, Kelley, Peacock, & Delgado, 2008), the purpose of this study is to conduct the first systematic review of qualitative research on autism disparities in the United States. Synthesizing and interpreting knowledge gained from qualitative research is important because it has the potential to offer a nuanced and contextualized understanding of health disparities based on individual lived experiences, while putting illness experiences into the context of socio-structural dynamics through which health disparities are created, sustained, and reproduced (Dubbin, McLemore, & Shim, 2017). Meta-reviews of qualitative research allow for attention to be drawn to mechanisms leading up to social phenomena like health disparities as well as the ability to connect these experiences to larger social, political, and economic contexts (Angus et al, 2013; Kingod, Cleal, Wahlberg, & Husted, 2017; McPherson & Armstrong, 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%