2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbi.2006.10.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Illness-induced anorexia and its possible function in the caterpillar, Manduca sexta

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
50
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
2
50
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…7B). We note that illness-induced anorexia has also been reported in response to infection by other pathogens in a diversity of other animals (Dantzer, 2004;Adamo et al, 2007;Adamo, 2008). Some studies suggest this effect is induced by the host's own immune system (Exton, 1997;Dantzer, 2004), while others suggest anorexia could be a response by the host to reallocation of energetic reserves to defense (Moret and Schmid-Hempel, 2000;Ahmed et al, 2002;Armitage et al, 2003;Dionne et al, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…7B). We note that illness-induced anorexia has also been reported in response to infection by other pathogens in a diversity of other animals (Dantzer, 2004;Adamo et al, 2007;Adamo, 2008). Some studies suggest this effect is induced by the host's own immune system (Exton, 1997;Dantzer, 2004), while others suggest anorexia could be a response by the host to reallocation of energetic reserves to defense (Moret and Schmid-Hempel, 2000;Ahmed et al, 2002;Armitage et al, 2003;Dionne et al, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Adamo and Shoemaker, 2000). In non-parasitized animals, immune challenge induces only a temporary reduction in feeding, not a permanent cessation (Adamo et al, 2007), suggesting that additional wasp-induced mechanisms are needed. Moreover, 3 days after the wasps emerge, the intensity of immunohistochemical staining for a wide range of neuropeptides within the host's supraoesophageal ganglion increases sharply (Zitnan et al, 1995).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One consequence of these behavioral changes is less energy expended in motivated behavior to acquire food, friends, and mates, and more energy available to the immune system. Although low motivation to eat may seem to work against the goal of providing energy to the immune system, the energetic costs of foraging may be more consequential during illness, food metabolism may compete with immune function [29], or some combination thereof. Therefore, it may be more efficient to rely on stored energy during illness.…”
Section: When Immunity Is a Priority: Sickness Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%