The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
Institutions, Contracts and Organizations 2000
DOI: 10.4337/9781781952764.00036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ill-defined property rights in collective action: the case of US agricultural cooperatives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
92
0
5

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
92
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…' 18 See Cook and Iliopoulos (2000) and Cook and Chaddad (2004) for details. 19 Cook, Klein, and Chambers (2005) document the emergence of a cluster of new-generation cooperatives in Renville County, Minnesota.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…' 18 See Cook and Iliopoulos (2000) and Cook and Chaddad (2004) for details. 19 Cook, Klein, and Chambers (2005) document the emergence of a cluster of new-generation cooperatives in Renville County, Minnesota.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The wide geographical operating areas mean that members work under quite diverse conditions, and so the conflicting interests may foster indifference. As the management thus gets few, unclear and conflicting signals from the membership there is a risk that neither the board of directors nor the CEO (Chief Executive Officer) can interpret what the members want them to do (Cook & Iliopoulos, 2000;Hendrikse, 2007).…”
Section: Members' Participation In the Governance Of Cooperativesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, economic variables show a similar trend to SWAP along a north-south axis across Europe, for which a number of explanations may exist. Therefore, we need to assess the true relationship between SWAP and yields, that is, the pseudo-isolated effect of SWAP (Cook 1998;Morrison 2000), controlled for important climate and economic variables.…”
Section: Deriving the Swap-yield Relationshipmentioning
confidence: 99%