1991
DOI: 10.1097/00006534-199103000-00004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Iliac Versus Cranial Bone for Secondary Grafting of Residual Alveolar Clefts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
28
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…7,15 Bone harvest from this site, however, has the disadvantage of the need for a separate donor site with its inherent morbidity. The complications of the anterior iliac approach include prolonged post-operative pain, [16][17][18] altered gait, 10,19 sensory nerve damage, 17,18 poor scar placement and altered bone contour, 18 delayed healing, 18 herniation of abdominal contents, 11 clicking during walking, 18 ilium fracture, 20 peritonitis, 6 excessive blood loss 18 and rarely retroperitoneal haematoma. 21 The precise cause of donor site pain remains obscure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7,15 Bone harvest from this site, however, has the disadvantage of the need for a separate donor site with its inherent morbidity. The complications of the anterior iliac approach include prolonged post-operative pain, [16][17][18] altered gait, 10,19 sensory nerve damage, 17,18 poor scar placement and altered bone contour, 18 delayed healing, 18 herniation of abdominal contents, 11 clicking during walking, 18 ilium fracture, 20 peritonitis, 6 excessive blood loss 18 and rarely retroperitoneal haematoma. 21 The precise cause of donor site pain remains obscure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Damage to these teeth is an unaccept able complication. So, if there is a chance o f damaging the toothbuds, autografts taken from rib, ilium or calvarium are indicated (Borstlap et al, 1990;Witsenburg and Freihofer, 1990;Cohen et al, 1991;Koole et al, 1991;Kortebein et al, 1991).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wolfe and Berkowitz (5) reported good ossification of bone grafts using cranial bone donor sites with ease of harvest and decreased donor site morbidity. Some authors reported unsatisfactory results comparing cranial bone and iliac crest, while some others reported similar results (15)(16)(17)(18). As long as cancellous bone was used, there was no significant difference seen in the final outcome (19,20).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%