Abstract:The small intestine is a frequent site of melanoma metastases and the most common cause of secondary intestinal tumors. Even though, its presentation with intestinal obstruction due to intussusception is very rare. We present a 47-year-old woman with a medical history of facial melanoma operated 17 years ago and recently diagnosed of cervical recurrence who complained of abdominal pain of one week duration accompanied with vomiting and abdominal distension. Computed tomography (CT) scan revealed marked distens… Show more
“…In our study, treatment of choice for all patients was surgery, with nearly all cases (93.8 %, n = 15) requiring emergency surgery, as previously reported [32], and 37.5 % (n = 6) undergoing segmental small bowel resection. Although there is no consensus regarding the optimal surgical approach, and there is still controversy about reduction before resection [32], several authors suggest resection as the best treatment option in adults, given nearly half of colonic and enteric intussusceptions are associated with malignancies [3,33].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Although there is no consensus regarding the optimal surgical approach, and there is still controversy about reduction before resection [32], several authors suggest resection as the best treatment option in adults, given nearly half of colonic and enteric intussusceptions are associated with malignancies [3,33]. Moreover, due to the several risks and severe complications associated with intussusceptions and their delayed treatment such as intraluminal seeding and dissemination, perforation and peritoneal dissemination with edematous, and fragile bowel wall [34,35], most surgeons recommend surgery regardless of the nature of their cause [36,37].…”
SummaryBackground Adult intussusception (AI) is a rare condition, usually with a lead point, and for which surgery is the treatment of choice. Given the risks and possible complications of untreated AI, an accurate preoperative diagnosis is of the utmost importance. Although AI remains difficult to diagnose, computerized tomography (CT) is presently considered the best diagnostic tool.Methods Sixteen patients of 20 years and older with intraoperative diagnosis of intussusception, who underwent surgery between January 2000 and December 2009, were reviewed retrospectively. Patients were assessed concerning clinical presentation, imagiological findings, surgical treatment, and postoperative histological evaluation.Results Most patients (93.8 %) were admitted via emergency room (ER) due to abdominal pain. Fourteen (87.5 %) AI cases showed an underlying organic cause, e.g., masses or tumors. The most frequent comorbidities were Peutz-Jeghers syndrome (PJS; 18.8 %) and HIV (12.5 %). Eight (50.0 %) intussusceptions were ileocolic and six (37.5 %) were in the small bowel. Total 43.8 % of lesions were malignant. Preoperative diagnosis of intussusception was possible in 50.0 % of cases by ultrasonography (US) and in 81.8 % by CT. US showed no predictive value concerning intussusception location. Total 27.3 % of CTs correctly identified the location, but only 9 % accurately identified the lead point.Conclusions We propose that all AI cases should be treated with surgical resection without attempting reduction, even when no lead point is detected by imaging studies, and this approach should be based on the oncological criteria. CT can be regarded as the most accurate diagnostic tool for intussusception, although its predictive value concerning location and lead point is still far from ideal.
“…In our study, treatment of choice for all patients was surgery, with nearly all cases (93.8 %, n = 15) requiring emergency surgery, as previously reported [32], and 37.5 % (n = 6) undergoing segmental small bowel resection. Although there is no consensus regarding the optimal surgical approach, and there is still controversy about reduction before resection [32], several authors suggest resection as the best treatment option in adults, given nearly half of colonic and enteric intussusceptions are associated with malignancies [3,33].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Although there is no consensus regarding the optimal surgical approach, and there is still controversy about reduction before resection [32], several authors suggest resection as the best treatment option in adults, given nearly half of colonic and enteric intussusceptions are associated with malignancies [3,33]. Moreover, due to the several risks and severe complications associated with intussusceptions and their delayed treatment such as intraluminal seeding and dissemination, perforation and peritoneal dissemination with edematous, and fragile bowel wall [34,35], most surgeons recommend surgery regardless of the nature of their cause [36,37].…”
SummaryBackground Adult intussusception (AI) is a rare condition, usually with a lead point, and for which surgery is the treatment of choice. Given the risks and possible complications of untreated AI, an accurate preoperative diagnosis is of the utmost importance. Although AI remains difficult to diagnose, computerized tomography (CT) is presently considered the best diagnostic tool.Methods Sixteen patients of 20 years and older with intraoperative diagnosis of intussusception, who underwent surgery between January 2000 and December 2009, were reviewed retrospectively. Patients were assessed concerning clinical presentation, imagiological findings, surgical treatment, and postoperative histological evaluation.Results Most patients (93.8 %) were admitted via emergency room (ER) due to abdominal pain. Fourteen (87.5 %) AI cases showed an underlying organic cause, e.g., masses or tumors. The most frequent comorbidities were Peutz-Jeghers syndrome (PJS; 18.8 %) and HIV (12.5 %). Eight (50.0 %) intussusceptions were ileocolic and six (37.5 %) were in the small bowel. Total 43.8 % of lesions were malignant. Preoperative diagnosis of intussusception was possible in 50.0 % of cases by ultrasonography (US) and in 81.8 % by CT. US showed no predictive value concerning intussusception location. Total 27.3 % of CTs correctly identified the location, but only 9 % accurately identified the lead point.Conclusions We propose that all AI cases should be treated with surgical resection without attempting reduction, even when no lead point is detected by imaging studies, and this approach should be based on the oncological criteria. CT can be regarded as the most accurate diagnostic tool for intussusception, although its predictive value concerning location and lead point is still far from ideal.
“…Melanoma is a tumor which is known to widely metastasize, involving organs which are not commonly involved by other tumors [12][13][14] . For example, melanoma accounts for more than 50% of metastases to the gallbladder ( Figure 5) and is the second most common metastasis to the spleen and the third most common to the testicle (Figure 6) [15][16][17][18][19] .…”
AIM:To investigate the frequency, typical and atypical locations and patterns of melanoma metastases identifiable by computed tomography (CT) in the abdomen and pelvis.
METHODS:We performed a retrospective review of index CT examinations of the abdomen and pelvis in patients with melanoma and recorded all findings suggestive of metastatic disease.
RESULTS:Metastases were present on 36% (181/508) of the index examinations and most commonly involved the liver (47%) and pelvic lymph nodes (27%). Lower extremity primaries had the highest rate of metastasis (52%). Ocular and head and neck melanomas have a predilection to metastasize to the liver (hepatic involvement in 70% and 63%, respectively, of patients with metastatic disease) and metastases from lower extremity primaries most commonly involve pelvic lymph nodes (54% of patients with metastatic disease). Metastases to atypical locations were present in 14% of patients and most commonly occurred in the subcutaneous tissue and spleen. Primary tumors of the lower extremity, back and head and neck were most commonly associated with atypical metastases. Pelvic metastases are more common with lower extremity primaries (accounting for 70% of cases with pelvic metastases) but 5% of patients with supraumbilical primaries also had pelvic metastases.
CONCLUSION:The distribution of metastatic melanoma in the abdomen and pelvis that we have defined should help guide the interpretation of CT exams in these patients.
“…Although a limited number of studies, intestinal obstruction secondary to intussusception is the most frequent clinical presentation of primary melanoma. 1,9,10,11,12 The presentation of our patient was ileocecal intussusception due to metastatic melanoma of the intestines.…”
Altmış üç yaşındaki erkek hasta karın ağrısı, kanlı dışkılama, bulantı ve kusma şikayetleri ile hastaneye müracaat etti. Yapılan muayene ve tetkiklerinde; bilgisayarlı tomografide intestinal intussusepsiyon ve karın içi lenf düğümleri saptandı. Kolonoskopik inceleme sonrası redüksiyon sağlanamadı. Laparotomide, çekuma invajine ince barsak segmentleri redükte olmaması üzerine sağ hemikolektomi ve palpasyonda ince barsakta lümen içi saptanan tümöral kitleleri içine alan 60 cm ince barsak segmenti rezeke edildi. Patolojik inceleme sonrasında kolonda 1 ve ince barsaklarda 8 toplamda 9 adet polipoid lezyon saptandı. Histolojik incelemede sitoplazmik melanin birikimi ile epiteloid ve iğsi tümör hücreleri izlendi. İmmünohistokimyasal boyamada tümör hücrelerinde S-100, HMB-45 ve melan-A pozitif olarak bulundu. Moleküler incelenmesi BRAF geni 15 Ekzonlar c.1799> a (p.v600 A) mutasyon saptanan hastanın malign melonom olarak rapor edilmesi sonrası hasta yeniden değerlendirildi ve göğüs ön duvarında deride malign melanom saptandı. Anahtar Kelimeler: İntussusepsiyon, metastaz, melanom
ÖZ ABSTRACTA 63-year-old man presented to the emergency department with abdominal pain, episodes of bloody stool, nausea, and vomiting. Abdominal computed tomography showed lower intestinal intussusception and enlarged lymph nodes. Colonoscopic reduction was not possible. Exploratory laparotomy revealed a 15-cm mass comprised of the ileocecal region that had intussuscepted secondary to the small bowel. Palliative right hemicolectomy and resection of 60 cm segments of the small bowel were performed. Pathologic examination of the excised specimen revealed polypoid masses. There were 9 polyps, 1 in the ascending colon and the others in the ileum. Histopathological examination demonstrated obvious features of melanoma associated with epitheloid and spindle tumor cells and cytoplasmic melanin deposition. The tumor cells showed positivity for S-100, HMB-45 and Melan-A. Molecular examination revealed a c.1799> A (p.v600 A) mutation in exon 15 of the BRAF gene. The patient was re-examined and a nevus was found on the left anterior chest wall.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.