2019
DOI: 10.24434/j.scoms.2018.02.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Il vestito forma la persona – “clothes make the man”: Fashion morality in Italian nineteenth-century conduct books

Abstract: Using a corpus of 40 influential conduct books published in Italy in the long nineteenth century, we apply current insights in the role of values for the emergence and maintenance of conventions developed within the pragmatics of politeness to the prescriptive discourse on fashion, because in these sources norms for verbal and non-verbal behaviour are justified in a similar way. We argue that fashion choices are always said to communicate moral values. Most conduct books reinforce fashion norms by anchoring th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, candidates are named after the Latin practice according to which people nominated for political elections were dressing in white ("candidus"). This dimension stresses the close relationship between the way we dress and specific social roles, which might be explicitly defined within codes of uniforms (e.g., in the military, healthcare or ecclesiastical domains), or less explicitly by common social practices and etiquettes (Gaulme & Gaulme, 2012;Paternoster & Saltamacchia, 2018). Beside expressing social status or role, fashion is also used by people to express social meanings about sexuality, gender and identity: the sense of belonging to what is perceived as masculine or feminine is another way to give further significance to what humans decide to wear (Gaulme & Gaulme, 2012;Reddy-Best & Pedersen, 2015).…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, candidates are named after the Latin practice according to which people nominated for political elections were dressing in white ("candidus"). This dimension stresses the close relationship between the way we dress and specific social roles, which might be explicitly defined within codes of uniforms (e.g., in the military, healthcare or ecclesiastical domains), or less explicitly by common social practices and etiquettes (Gaulme & Gaulme, 2012;Paternoster & Saltamacchia, 2018). Beside expressing social status or role, fashion is also used by people to express social meanings about sexuality, gender and identity: the sense of belonging to what is perceived as masculine or feminine is another way to give further significance to what humans decide to wear (Gaulme & Gaulme, 2012;Reddy-Best & Pedersen, 2015).…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 99%