The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 9:30 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 1 hour.
2012
DOI: 10.1080/01431161.2012.712233
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

IKONOS image fusion process using steepest descent method with bi-linear interpolation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Generally, bilinear resampling can exactly reconstruct at most a first-degree polynomial, whereas cubic convolution resampling has the potential to reconstruct exactly any second-degree polynomial [48]. Although the difference between the bilinear and cubic convolution resamplers has been found to be negligible for certain remote sensing applications such as supervised classification [49] cubic convolution is recommended for pansharpening applications [21,50,51]. Consequently, in this study, the cubic convolution resampler was used to resample the 30 m data to 15 m.…”
Section: Resampling Landsat 8 30 M Multispectral Bands To 15 M Panchrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, bilinear resampling can exactly reconstruct at most a first-degree polynomial, whereas cubic convolution resampling has the potential to reconstruct exactly any second-degree polynomial [48]. Although the difference between the bilinear and cubic convolution resamplers has been found to be negligible for certain remote sensing applications such as supervised classification [49] cubic convolution is recommended for pansharpening applications [21,50,51]. Consequently, in this study, the cubic convolution resampler was used to resample the 30 m data to 15 m.…”
Section: Resampling Landsat 8 30 M Multispectral Bands To 15 M Panchrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, several commonly known objective quality indexes, including correlation coefficient (CC) [4], spatial CC (SCC) [5], spectral angle mapper (SAM) [6], Q4 [7], and QNR [8] are adopted to evaluate the sharpened products. QNR uses the original MS and PAN images as the references, and the other indexes use the bicubic interpolated MS image as the reference.…”
Section: Test Data and Evaluation Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resolution of each level is different, and the number of pixels in current level i is half of that in previous level i − 1. Therefore, C A 3 is first up-sampled by bilinear interpolation 22 to have the same size as C A 2.…”
Section: -D-dwtmentioning
confidence: 99%