IKDC Subjective Knee Form and Marx Activity Rating Scale are suitable to evaluate all orthopaedic sports medicine knee conditions: a systematic review

Kanakamedala, Ajay C.; Anderson, Allen F.; Irrgang, James J.

doi:10.1136/jisakos-2015-000014

Cited by 17 publications

(22 citation statements)

References 64 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…PROMs are essential to forming a complete picture of a patient’s symptoms and ability to function after surgery 15. Clinically, knee hyperextension is believed to be a risk factor for poor outcome following ACL-R, but the relationship between maximum knee extension angle during walking and PROMs following ACL-R had not been investigated.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…PROMs are widely utilised to evaluate outcomes after ACL-R, and these are important to measure the patients’ perception of their symptoms, activity limitations and participation restrictions 15. Therefore, the purpose of the present study was to determine if maximum knee extension angle during walking is related to PROMs following ACL-R using the same protocol and patient population as the previously published study 14.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 94%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Patient-reported outcome measures following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction are not related to dynamic knee extension angle

et al. 2018

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 94%

Patient-reported outcome measures following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction are not related to dynamic knee extension angle

et al. 2018

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Moreover, normative data have been determined, which is valuable for comparisons, as well as cut-offs for what the patients consider as an acceptable symptom state. 98 There are also other promising PROs used to cover different aspects of recovery after ACL reconstruction, including the Quality of Life Outcome Measure for Chronic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Deficiency (ACL-QoL) 99 and the Knee Numeric-Entity Evaluation Score (KNEES-ACL). 100 The ACL-QoL is used to determine the effectiveness of ACL reconstruction, or any other treatment, and is a 32-item condition-specific quality-of-life scale for patients with ACL deficiency.…”

Section: Consensus Statementmentioning

confidence: 99%

Clinical outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament injury: Panther Symposium ACL Injury Clinical Outcomes Consensus Group

et al. 2020

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeA stringent outcome assessment is a key aspect for establishing evidence-based clinical guidelines for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury treatment. The aim of this consensus statement was to establish what data should be reported when conducting an ACL outcome study, what specific outcome measurements should be used and at what follow-up time those outcomes should be assessed.MethodsTo establish a standardised assessment of clinical outcome after ACL treatment, a consensus meeting including a multidisciplinary group of ACL experts was held at the ACL Consensus Meeting Panther Symposium, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, in June 2019. The group reached consensus on nine statements by using a modified Delphi method.ResultsIn general, outcomes after ACL treatment can be divided into four robust categories—early adverse events, patient-reported outcomes, ACL graft failure/recurrent ligament disruption, and clinical measures of knee function and structure. A comprehensive assessment following ACL treatment should aim to provide a complete overview of the treatment result, optimally including the various aspects of outcome categories. For most research questions, a minimum follow-up of 2 years with an optimal follow-up rate of 80% is necessary to achieve a comprehensive assessment. This should include clinical examination, any sustained re-injuries, validated knee-specific patient-reported outcomes and Health-Related Quality of Life questionnaires. In the mid-term to long-term follow-up, the presence of osteoarthritis should be evaluated.ConclusionThis consensus paper provides practical guidelines for how the aforementioned entities of outcomes should be reported and suggests the preferred tools for a reliable and valid assessment of outcome after ACL treatment.Level of EvidenceLevel V.

show abstract

“…Moreover, normative data have been determined, which is valuable for comparisons as well as cutoffs for what the patients consider an acceptable symptom state. 52 There are also other promising PROs used to cover different aspects of recovery after ACL reconstruction, including the Quality of Life Outcome Measure for Chronic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Deficiency (ACL-QoL) 69 and the Knee Numeric-Entity Evaluation Score (KNEES-ACL). 24 The ACL-QoL is used to determine the effectiveness of ACL reconstruction, or any other treatment, and is a 32-item condition-specific quality of life scale for patients with ACL deficiency.…”

Section: Kiramentioning

confidence: 99%

Clinical Outcomes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: Panther Symposium ACL Injury Clinical Outcomes Consensus Group

Svantesson

Senorski

Webster

et al. 2020

Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A stringent outcome assessment is a key aspect of establishing evidence-based clinical guidelines for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury treatment. To establish a standardized assessment of clinical outcome after ACL treatment, a consensus meeting including a multidisciplinary group of ACL experts was held at the ACL Consensus Meeting Panther Symposium, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA, in June 2019. The aim was to establish a consensus on what data should be reported when conducting an ACL outcome study, what specific outcome measurements should be used, and at what follow-up time those outcomes should be assessed. The group reached consensus on 9 statements by using a modified Delphi method. In general, outcomes after ACL treatment can be divided into 4 robust categories: early adverse events, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), ACL graft failure/recurrent ligament disruption, and clinical measures of knee function and structure. A comprehensive assessment after ACL treatment should aim to provide a complete overview of the treatment result, optimally including the various aspects of outcome categories. For most research questions, a minimum follow-up of 2 years with an optimal follow-up rate of 80% is necessary to achieve a comprehensive assessment. This should include clinical examination, any sustained reinjuries, validated knee-specific PROs, and health-related quality of life questionnaires. In the midterm to long-term follow-up, the presence of osteoarthritis should be evaluated. This consensus paper provides practical guidelines for how the aforementioned entities of outcomes should be reported and suggests the preferred tools for a reliable and valid assessment of outcome after ACL treatment.

show abstract

IKDC Subjective Knee Form and Marx Activity Rating Scale are suitable to evaluate all orthopaedic sports medicine knee conditions: a systematic review

Cited by 17 publications

References 64 publications

Patient-reported outcome measures following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction are not related to dynamic knee extension angle

Patient-reported outcome measures following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction are not related to dynamic knee extension angle

Clinical outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament injury: Panther Symposium ACL Injury Clinical Outcomes Consensus Group

Clinical Outcomes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: Panther Symposium ACL Injury Clinical Outcomes Consensus Group

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About