1970
DOI: 10.1177/000348947007900103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

III Effects of Eustachian Tube Ligation

Abstract: Experimental production of serous effusion in the middle ear of animals has been achieved by other investigators by direct attack upon the Eustachian tube with cautery or ligation.l-" It would appear that the bullar effusion which results may be caused by one of three processes: 1) trauma to the tubal lumen may induce infection which could extend to the bulla and cause an outpouring of inflammatory exudate; 2) tubal edema or fibrosis could result in tubal obstruction followed by effusion ex vacuo; or 3) peritu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

1972
1972
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Cats were chosen because normally, their mcsotympanic mucosa contains seromucinous glands near the tym panic orifice of the Eustachian tube [9].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cats were chosen because normally, their mcsotympanic mucosa contains seromucinous glands near the tym panic orifice of the Eustachian tube [9].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 With regard to the last, numerous past studies in animals have shown that physical obstruction of the tubal lumen causes ME mucosal metaplasia and an effusion resembling in biochemical composition a transudate from the vascular compartment. [3][4][5][6][7] However, histopathologic studies of autopsy materials do not demonstrate physical obstruction of the tubal lumen in cases of OME. 8 " 10 This negative evidence was used to discount a role for tubal obstruction in the development of OME.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Infection was considered the cause of the fluid since bacteria were found in the middle ear fluids in many experimental and clinical studies. Proud [11], in 1970, showed that the fluid would accumulate without an infection. His data ( Figure 3) also showed that a patent myringotomy prevented the accumulation of the fluid.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%