1959
DOI: 10.1016/0095-8522(59)90004-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

II. Measurement of dynamic surface tensions of aqueous solutions by the falling meniscus method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
1

Year Published

1961
1961
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, we can write Eq. [12] in the form The system of equations [7] to [10] cannot be solved analytically. Ward and Tordai (24) …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, we can write Eq. [12] in the form The system of equations [7] to [10] cannot be solved analytically. Ward and Tordai (24) …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is the possibility of direct numeric solution of the initial and boundary value problem [7] - [10], which yields the functions c(x, t) and G(t) (37-41).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ADI equations may be expressed, following Ryskin and Leal (6), in the form In Eqs. [23] and [24], t a denotes an artificial time step that is chosen to optimize the convergence of the ADI iteration, and the superscript n denotes the ADI iteration index and should not be confused with the time step index in Table 4. Equation [14] is different from the other equations in that it is one dimensional.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, measurements have sometimes been performed without the benefit of a complete theoretical understanding of the dynamic interfacial phenomena under consideration, resulting in the partial accounting of the influence of bulk-phase viscous stresses at fluid interfaces (Langmuir 1936, Harkins & Meyers 1937, Davies 1957, confusion between the effects of interfacial-tension gradient and interfacial viscous phenomena (Derjaguin & Titievskaya 1957, Lucassen & van den Tempel 1972, Clint et al 1981, as well as ambiguities between the interpretation of: (a) dynamic interfacial tension a and (b) thermodynamic interfacial tension <r measured at a nonequilibrium surfactant adsorption (Clint et al 1981, Defay & Hommelen 1959. Throughout the perusal of these four chapters (6-9) it should be borne in mind that precise experimental values appear less commonly in the literature for interfacial rheological properties than for their bulk-phase counterparts.…”
Section: Measurement Of Dynamic Interfacial Tension and Dilatational mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data taken fromDefay & Hommelen (1959). Surface tension vs surface age for 0.012g/l aqueous solution of normal dodecyl alcohol, by the falling meniscus method.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%