2012
DOI: 10.1109/mits.2012.2203222
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

iGPS: Global Positioning in Urban Canyons with Road Surface Maps

Abstract: Interval Global Positioning with road Surface (iGPS) is a new method to obtain a robust and continuous positioning in urban areas by tightly-coupling precise 3-D drivable area maps with GPS pseudorange measurements. Map and GPS measurements are represented by geometric constraints, thus turning the localization problem into a constraint satisfaction problem whose solution is the confidence domain of position. Interval analysis is employed to solve the problem by using contractions and bisections of a prior pos… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We report results obtained with the same dataset as that used in [19]. The test starts with good satellite visibility, before entering urban canyons with 2 or 3 satellites in view.…”
Section: B Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We report results obtained with the same dataset as that used in [19]. The test starts with good satellite visibility, before entering urban canyons with 2 or 3 satellites in view.…”
Section: B Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To reduce positioning ambiguities and limit the number of road facets used for contraction, a road-topology aware facet selection step can be implemented before calling the SIVIA algorithm [26]. Similarly to a map-matching algorithm, the topological facet selection step makes use of facet connections, covered distance, and prior position to determine the candidate triangles of the map.…”
Section: Position Computationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• 3D building model -this level encompasses all approaches based on 3D building models which do not rely on ray tracing or shadow matching: [4], [22], [71], [81], [82], [83].…”
Section: Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, building boundary data, digital terrain models and building models were used. [8], [14], [33], [50], [80], [98], [99] [4], [14], [30], [33], [35], [92], [47], [48], [50], [51], [58], [67], [68], [70], [74], [81], [82], [83], [85] Via person [18], [22] [43], [49], [66], [71] (No information) [28], [29], [31], [32], [34], [37], [73], [84], [86], [87], [88] Simulation Static measurement…”
Section: Recent Solutions For Positioning Under Nlos Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%