2016
DOI: 10.1080/14703297.2015.1123104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘Ignoring me is part of learning’: Supervisory feedback on doctoral writing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
56
0
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
56
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to expectations for their own learning, the participants entered their programs with clear expectations about supervision, including that they would receive guidance (without "spoonfeeding"), that they would be contacted and given feedback in a timely fashion, and that they In other cases, student expectations were not fully met, with one participant noting, "professor feedback would be wonderful in some areas but it's not always available." Such variations in supervisory support have been noted in previous literature (Carter & Kumar, 2017;Paré, 2011).…”
Section: Expectations and Misalignmentssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…In addition to expectations for their own learning, the participants entered their programs with clear expectations about supervision, including that they would receive guidance (without "spoonfeeding"), that they would be contacted and given feedback in a timely fashion, and that they In other cases, student expectations were not fully met, with one participant noting, "professor feedback would be wonderful in some areas but it's not always available." Such variations in supervisory support have been noted in previous literature (Carter & Kumar, 2017;Paré, 2011).…”
Section: Expectations and Misalignmentssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Constructive, dialectical feedback allows students to take ownership of the knowledge creation process. However, if feedback is largely instructive, where the supervisor tells, prescribes or instructs, and corrects students' writing, then the ownership of that new knowledge might well be located with the supervisor and not the student (Carter & Kumar, 2017). In some instances, supervisors take over the writingactually rewrite students' paragraphs.…”
Section: And What Can We Learn From This?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instructive feedback then, has certain implications for how learning happens as well as autonomy and ownership of the knowledge creation process. If feedback is entirely instructive and directive, a telling, the candidate is likely to follow due instruction and write up the thesis as directed (Carter & Kumar, 2017). The location of authority and ownership of the new knowledge in, this instance, resides with the supervisor.…”
Section: And What Can We Learn From This?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bloom et al's (2007, p.31) study supports this finding as they also underlined that "graduate students value advisors who are accessible and approachable" on academic and personal issues. As Carter and Kumar (2017) underline, supervision in itself teaches something not only to postgraduate students but also supervisors themselves: …how to work with people who are not automatically on the same wave length -the skill of working across diversity is commonly expressed in doctoral graduate attributes, but is also an attribute that we supervisors need to learn (p. 73).…”
Section: Discussion Conclusion and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%