Double Disillusion: The 2016 Australian Federal Election 2018
DOI: 10.22459/dd.04.2018.27
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘Ignore Us at Your Peril, Because We Vote Too’: Indigenous Policy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Coalition chose to disregard the Redfern Statement during the campaign, but Minister Nigel Scullion later claimed it was a ‘good read’ and that he agreed with 80% of it (Scullion, ). The Labor Party responded thoughtfully to many of the detailed policy demands during the campaign but did not directly address the call for a stand‐alone Department (Perche, ). It remains to be seen whether the Redfern Statement receives the attention it deserves in the longer term.…”
Section: The Redfern Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Coalition chose to disregard the Redfern Statement during the campaign, but Minister Nigel Scullion later claimed it was a ‘good read’ and that he agreed with 80% of it (Scullion, ). The Labor Party responded thoughtfully to many of the detailed policy demands during the campaign but did not directly address the call for a stand‐alone Department (Perche, ). It remains to be seen whether the Redfern Statement receives the attention it deserves in the longer term.…”
Section: The Redfern Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%