Ignorance by choice: A meta-analytic review of the underlying motives of willful ignorance and its consequences.

Abstract

People sometimes avoid information about the impact of their actions as an excuse to be selfish. Such "willful ignorance" reduces altruistic behavior and has detrimental effects in many consumer and organizational contexts. We report the first meta-analysis on willful ignorance, testing the robustness of its impact on altruistic behavior and examining its underlying motives. We analyze 33,603 decisions made by 6,531 participants in 56 different treatment effects, all employing variations of an experimental paradigm assessing willful ignorance. Meta-analytic results reveal that 40% of participants avoid easily obtainable information about the consequences of their actions on others, leading to a 15.6-percentage point decrease in altruistic behavior compared to when information is provided. We discuss the motives behind willful Psychological Bulletin

To Zone or Not to Zone When Upgrading a Wet Heating System from Gas to Heat Pump for Maximum Climate Impact: A UK View

“…However, comfort-seeking occupants demanding tight ("stiff") temperature control with such alternative regulation schemes may indeed see their heat pump interact badly with TRVs and waste energy, as Heat Geek flags up, and the modelling demonstrates. Some such occupants will neither care to know nor act on this [67], but it is likely that most would. Even apparently innocuous fiddling with the settings panel for some systems (in response to someone complaining that they are too cold on a very cold day) may shift the control regime, e.g., by increasing "room influence", and have a disproportionate effect on energy consumption and footprint.…”

Do Thermostatic Radiator Valves Waste Energy in UK Heat Pump Retrofits?

“…However, comfort-seeking occupants demanding tight ('stiff') temperature control with such alternative regulation schemes may indeed see their heat pump interact badly with TRVs and waste energy, as Heat Geek flags up, and the modelling demonstrates. Some such occupants will neither care to know nor act on this [46], but it is likely that most would.…”

Deliberately ignoring inequality to avoid rejecting unfair offers

“…In particular, we analyzed rejection rates from 17 UG studies with varying levels of inequality 34 , resulting in expected mean probabilities of rejection for high and moderate inequality under certainty of 68% and 28%, respectively. Further, based on a recent meta-analytic review of 22 studies on deliberate ignorance 54 , we expected a probability of ignorance of 0.40 for moderate inequality and 0.44 for high inequality. Based on our pilot data (see Supplementary Notes 2 and 3), we expected that the probability of rejection under ignorance would not be larger than 0.10. resulting probabilities of rejection under moderate inequality and uncertainty and high inequality and uncertainty were 0.18 and 0.41, respectively.…”