2015
DOI: 10.1063/1.4936346
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ignition threshold for non-Maxwellian plasmas

Abstract: An optically thin $p$-$^{11}$B plasma loses more energy to bremsstrahlung than it gains from fusion reactions, unless the ion temperature can be elevated above the electron temperature. In thermal plasmas, the temperature differences required are possible in small Coulomb logarithm regimes, characterized by high density and low temperature. The minimum Lawson criterion for thermal $p$-$^{11}$B plasmas and the minimum $\rho R$ required for ICF volume ignition are calculated. Ignition could be reached more easil… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some phenomena occurring in these devices break the symmetry of the Maxwellian distribution function (MDF) such as radio-frequency wave heating, neutral beam injection, ion orbit loss or simply boundary and external conditions (plasma-surface interaction, external magnetic field configuration, etc) (see ). Another phenomenon that is highly relevant to future fusion reactors is the self-heating by alpha particles produced by fusion reactions [14,15]. All these phenomena need to be considered in plasma physics in order to better reproduce the dynamics of current tokamaks and predict the confinement of future fusion reactors because to date, there is no rigorous and efficient theory describing non-Maxwellian distributions (NMDF) at finite collisionality.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some phenomena occurring in these devices break the symmetry of the Maxwellian distribution function (MDF) such as radio-frequency wave heating, neutral beam injection, ion orbit loss or simply boundary and external conditions (plasma-surface interaction, external magnetic field configuration, etc) (see ). Another phenomenon that is highly relevant to future fusion reactors is the self-heating by alpha particles produced by fusion reactions [14,15]. All these phenomena need to be considered in plasma physics in order to better reproduce the dynamics of current tokamaks and predict the confinement of future fusion reactors because to date, there is no rigorous and efficient theory describing non-Maxwellian distributions (NMDF) at finite collisionality.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]). Another phenomenon that is highly relevant to future fusion reactors is the self-heating by alpha particles produced by fusion reactions [14,15]. All these phenomena need to be considered in plasma physics in order to better reproduce the dynamics of current tokamaks and predict the confinement of future fusion reactors because to date, there is no rigorous and efficient theory describing non-Maxwellian distributions (NMDF) at finite collisionality.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In imagining the future, we should be prepared to apply the paradigms developed here to many different configurations, both for applications other than nuclear fusion, and of course for nuclear fusion, possibly using advanced fuels [109], or under exotic plasma conditions, such as high-density degenerate plasma [110]. The paradigm of producing fusion may itself change, such as through fusion-fission parks, using fusion neutrons to breed nuclear fuel for use in conventional nuclear reactors [111].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This created a plasma condition where the Bremsstrahlung radiation loss power density could be reduced while maintaining the fusion power density. 6,17 2. By increasing the proton fraction x p of the plasma ions, reducing the effective charge (Z eff ) of the plasma, the Bremsstrahlung radiation loss would be reduced furthe,r 6,17 without reducing the fusion power substantially.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%