2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2015.05.049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ignition and combustion characteristics of various biodiesel fuels (BDFs)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(45 reference statements)
0
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be explained that the cetane number (61.5) of PCO and viscosity (4.29) is higher than that of ULSD (see Table 1), and it leads to the compressibility of PCO fuel being lower and the combustion of PCO fuel starting faster than that of ULSD [41,43]. At middle and high engine loads (0.39 MPa and 0.52 MPa), the ROHR of BD20 is the biggest compared with ULSD and PCO, it is again verified that the influence of the oxygen content is great [43,44]. In order to comprehensively investigate the application of canola oil in a common rail diesel engine, the combustion pressure and ROHR for each test fuel are shown in Figure 4.…”
Section: Combustion Pressure and Rate Of Heat Release (Rohr)mentioning
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It can be explained that the cetane number (61.5) of PCO and viscosity (4.29) is higher than that of ULSD (see Table 1), and it leads to the compressibility of PCO fuel being lower and the combustion of PCO fuel starting faster than that of ULSD [41,43]. At middle and high engine loads (0.39 MPa and 0.52 MPa), the ROHR of BD20 is the biggest compared with ULSD and PCO, it is again verified that the influence of the oxygen content is great [43,44]. In order to comprehensively investigate the application of canola oil in a common rail diesel engine, the combustion pressure and ROHR for each test fuel are shown in Figure 4.…”
Section: Combustion Pressure and Rate Of Heat Release (Rohr)mentioning
confidence: 70%
“…It depends on the temperature and pressure of the surroundings and oxygen concentration of fuel. Generally, the chemical delay is larger than the physical delay due to the chemical reactions being faster, and higher a cetane number of fuel indicates a shorter chemical delay time [42,44].…”
Section: Chemical Delaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The significant difference in the ID reduction due to GO in the two fuels can be attributed to the higher surface tension of the GDB droplet compared to that of the GDD droplet (see Table ). A large surface tension (ie, strong intermolecular layer) along the surface of the GDB droplet hinders the evaporation process because of the strong attraction between the polar GO nanoparticles and polar biodiesel molecules . On the other hand, the polar nature of GO (ie, high electronegativity particles with the presence of oxygen) weakens the intermolecular forces of the nonpolar hydrocarbons of diesel (ie, low electronegativity molecules due to the absence of oxygen), thus resulting in a decrease in viscosity for the GDD fuel.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, as investigated by [33], one of the factors that could affect ignition delay and subsequent combustion processes is the fuel cetane number. Biodiesel fuels have higher cetane number as presented in Table 2 and this could have facilitated its shorter ignition delay when compared to diesel.…”
Section: Effect Of Ambient Temperature On Ignition Delaymentioning
confidence: 99%