2004
DOI: 10.1038/sj.leu.2403531
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

IgH DJ rearrangements within T-ALL correlate with cCD79a expression, an immature/TCRγδ phenotype and absence of IL7Rα/CD127 expression

Abstract: cCD79a and IgH VDJ/DJ rearrangements are considered to be relatively specific for B lymphoid precursors. We looked for both in cCD3 þ , CD7 þ , CD19-T-ALLs classified by TCR status into ab or cd/immature (IM) lineages, with individualization of HOX11L2 þ T-ALLs since they represent an intermediate ab/cd category. cCD79a was expressed at low levels in 47% of T-ALL and was most frequent in IMc T-ALLs. IgH rearrangements were common in cd/IM (45%) and HOX11L2 þ (35%) T-ALLs compared to HOX11L2-negative cases (3%;… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(26 reference statements)
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Co‐expression in blasts of immunophenotypic markers associated with other differentiation lineages was found in this study like CD2 in 2 of seven tested cases of BCP‐ALL, cyCD79a in four of five tested cases of T‐ALL and CD117 in two cases of T‐ALL and two cases of BCP‐ALL. These results confirm that these markers can be regarded as lineage‐associated but not specific (35–39) and that the usefulness of a lineage non‐specific marker for allocation of blasts to a single lineage is limited (39). Large panels should be used to properly appreciate blast immunophenotypic features (40).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Co‐expression in blasts of immunophenotypic markers associated with other differentiation lineages was found in this study like CD2 in 2 of seven tested cases of BCP‐ALL, cyCD79a in four of five tested cases of T‐ALL and CD117 in two cases of T‐ALL and two cases of BCP‐ALL. These results confirm that these markers can be regarded as lineage‐associated but not specific (35–39) and that the usefulness of a lineage non‐specific marker for allocation of blasts to a single lineage is limited (39). Large panels should be used to properly appreciate blast immunophenotypic features (40).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…The main objective of the AL screening panel (ALST) is to provide information about the lineage of the leukemic blasts (Table ). In addition, ALST allows identification of expression of some lineage infidelity markers, such as the expression of cytoplasmic (Cy) CD79a and CD19 by t(8;21) positive acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients , Cy CD79 positivity in some T‐ALL , and CD7 in some AML cases .…”
Section: Al Screening Panelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, CyCD79a was added to improve B-lineage assignment, even though it is also expressed in t(8;21) + AML cases 50, 51, 54, 55 and at low levels in a significant number of T-ALL cases, particularly the immature and T-cell receptor (TCR)γδ + T-ALL subgroups. 62, 63, 64 Of note, CyCD79a was preferred to CyCD22 because CD22 is not lineage specific as it is also expressed at high levels in normal basophils, mast cells and some dendritic cells. 65, 66, 67 Finally, CD7 was selected because it is positive in virtually all cases of T-ALL and in a subset of, usually CyMPO-negative, AML.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The choice of fluorochromes resulted from the strategic decision to use less common fluorochromes for gating markers so that the more common fluorochromes could be used for characterization markers in a more flexible way. Importantly, three T-ALL backbone markers were also included in the ALOT to benefit from the ALOT information on CyMPO, 36 CyCD79a 62, 63, 64 and CD34 49 expression using the merge function of the Infinicyt software. 16 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%