2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2021.106278
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

IgG4 antibodies against Bm14 as an evaluation tool of mass drug administration in a co-endemic area of Brugia timori and Wuchereria bancrofti

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The same positive cutoff was selected for the anti-rBm14 and anti-rWb123 ELISA for consistency. This is similar to previously reported cutoffs for assays with Bm14 [ 16 ].…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The same positive cutoff was selected for the anti-rBm14 and anti-rWb123 ELISA for consistency. This is similar to previously reported cutoffs for assays with Bm14 [ 16 ].…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The general outcome is that humans are living longer lives with improved access to more and better quality food, health care and hygiene. These benefits have arisen from the progress made in veterinary and human medicine, including advancements in diagnostic capacity (Djuardi et al 2022 ), anti-parasitic drugs (Tavul et al 2022 ), vaccines (Lightowlers et al 2021 ), and, more recently, bioengineering approaches to neutralise disease vectors (Wang et al 2021 ; Windbichler et al 2011 ). Conversely, this period of development has in parallel experienced ongoing negative changes to the natural environment in response to an ever-increasing demand of natural resources and developed space (Crippa et al 2021 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Related to this, the BR test (mentioned earlier), also an IgG4 rapid test, showed a significant decrease in filariasis detection posttreatment and is used for evaluating the success of the mass drug administration in brugian filariasis areas. 15,16 A limitation of our study is the small number of samples, especially G2 and G4. In conclusion, the SsRapid showed an overall good performance compared with the two commercial IgG-ELISAs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%