IgG response to MHC class I epitope peptides is a quantitative predictive biomarker in the early course of treatment of colorectal cancer using therapeutic peptides
Abstract:Cancer vaccines have been developed as a new therapeutic approach, however, their clinical benefit remains limited. We previously performed a phase II study for advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) using five human leukocyte antigen (HLA-A*24:02)-restricted peptides derived from kinase of the outer chloroplast membrane 1, translocase of outer mitochondrial membrane 34 (TOMM34), ring finger protein 43 (RNF43), vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1 (VEGFR1) and VEGFR2. In the present study the relationship b… Show more
“…In contrast to the detection of CTL responses, the measurement of IgG has several benefits, ie, it is easier and more robust than the time‐consuming CTL assay. Several research groups are thus using the IgG response as a prognostic biomarker for vaccine therapy …”
The identification of useful biomarkers is an urgent issue in cancer treatment, particularly for immunotherapy, as only some patients experience benefits from this treatment. The early induction of the IgG response has been reported as a useful biomarker of favorable prognosis for cancer patients treated with a personalized peptide vaccination, but a portion of these patients (IgG nonresponders) fail to achieve an early induction of IgG response yet experience long‐term survival. It is thus necessary to identify other biomarkers of favorable prognosis among these patients. Here we report the usefulness of classical T‐cell markers (ie, the CD8 content and the CD4/CD8 ratio in peripheral blood) in IgG nonresponders among advanced or recurrent ovarian cancer patients treated with a personalized peptide vaccination. Among IgG nonresponders (n = 25), the overall survival (OS) of the increased‐CD8 group (n = 7) was significantly longer than that of the decreased‐CD8 group (n = 18; P = .018), and the OS of the patients with a decreased CD4/CD8 ratio (n = 10) was significantly longer than that of the patients with an increased ratio (n = 15; P = .0055). Thus, an increased content of CD8 and a decreased CD4/CD8 ratio are each favorable prognosis markers in IgG nonresponders treated with a personalized peptide vaccination.
“…In contrast to the detection of CTL responses, the measurement of IgG has several benefits, ie, it is easier and more robust than the time‐consuming CTL assay. Several research groups are thus using the IgG response as a prognostic biomarker for vaccine therapy …”
The identification of useful biomarkers is an urgent issue in cancer treatment, particularly for immunotherapy, as only some patients experience benefits from this treatment. The early induction of the IgG response has been reported as a useful biomarker of favorable prognosis for cancer patients treated with a personalized peptide vaccination, but a portion of these patients (IgG nonresponders) fail to achieve an early induction of IgG response yet experience long‐term survival. It is thus necessary to identify other biomarkers of favorable prognosis among these patients. Here we report the usefulness of classical T‐cell markers (ie, the CD8 content and the CD4/CD8 ratio in peripheral blood) in IgG nonresponders among advanced or recurrent ovarian cancer patients treated with a personalized peptide vaccination. Among IgG nonresponders (n = 25), the overall survival (OS) of the increased‐CD8 group (n = 7) was significantly longer than that of the decreased‐CD8 group (n = 18; P = .018), and the OS of the patients with a decreased CD4/CD8 ratio (n = 10) was significantly longer than that of the patients with an increased ratio (n = 15; P = .0055). Thus, an increased content of CD8 and a decreased CD4/CD8 ratio are each favorable prognosis markers in IgG nonresponders treated with a personalized peptide vaccination.
“…370 Kanekiyo and colleagues (Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi, Japan) combined a vaccine based on 5 HLA-A*24:02-restricted peptides with oxaliplatin in patients with colorectal cancer, finding humoral responses to multiple peptides that were associated with cytotoxic T-cell responses and/or improved overall survival (OS). 371 Geyer and collaborators (Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA) employed CD19-targeting chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells in patients afflicted by residual CLL upon chemotherapy with pentostatin (is a purine analog that inhibits nucleic acid synthesis), cyclophosphamide and rituximab (a CD20targeting monoclonal antibody). 205 This approach achieved 38% ORR, with two patients exhibiting complete responses exceeding 28 months in the absence of severe cytokine release syndromes.…”
The term 'immunogenic cell death' (ICD) denotes an immunologically unique type of regulated cell death that enables, rather than suppresses, T cell-driven immune responses that are specific for antigens derived from the dying cells. The ability of ICD to elicit adaptive immunity heavily relies on the immunogenicity of dying cells, implying that such cells must encode and present antigens not covered by central tolerance (antigenicity), and deliver immunostimulatory molecules such as damage-associated molecular patterns and cytokines (adjuvanticity). Moreover, the host immune system must be equipped to detect the antigenicity and adjuvanticity of dying cells. As cancer (but not normal) cells express several antigens not covered by central tolerance, they can be driven into ICD by some therapeutic agents, including (but not limited to) chemotherapeutics of the anthracycline family, oxaliplatin and bortezomib, as well as radiation therapy. In this Trial Watch, we describe current trends in the preclinical and clinical development of ICD-eliciting chemotherapy as partner for immunotherapy, with a focus on trials assessing efficacy in the context of immunomonitoring.
“…[34,43,93] Immunotherapy has become a mainstay in cancer treatment, mainly via the blockage of T cell-associated proteins (PD-1/PD-L1 or CTLA-4). [134,140,141,144,145] The compatibility of RAPTA-C with approved immune-oncology treatments needs to be established and compared to other ruthenium-based compounds prior to further development in clinical trials. [134,140,141,144,145] The compatibility of RAPTA-C with approved immune-oncology treatments needs to be established and compared to other ruthenium-based compounds prior to further development in clinical trials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After vaccination, IgG levels targeting VEGFR2 were significantly increased, which correlated with overall survival in HLA‐matched patients. CTL responses to VEGFR1 and VEGFR2 were also significantly increased in the HLA‐matched group …”
Section: How To Benefit From and With Immunotherapy?mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…[147][148][149][150][151][152] Platinum-based drugs lead to an enhancement of the immune response directly at the tumor site, and therefore, it is very possible that certain ruthenium compounds will harbor similar properties. [134,141] For example, NAMI-A affects chemokine (monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 [MCP-1] and VEGF)-mediated migration of cancer cells, [45] inhibits the circulation of immunocyte-derived pro-metastatic signals that influence the homeostasis of immune cells, [141] and modulates lymphocyte recruitment. It appears that the clinically evaluated complexes NAMI-A and KP1019 modulate cancer-immune cross-talk without altering the expression of surface markers of cancer cells.…”
Section: How To Benefit From and With Immunotherapy?mentioning
The organometallic ruthenium(II) [Ru(arene)Cl2PTA] PTA -1,3,5-triaza-7-phosphaadamantane compound, RAPTA-C, represents an innovative anti-cancer therapeutic and a better-tolerated alternative to platinum (Pt)-based chemotherapeutic drugs in the treatment of cancer. RAPTA-C exhibits anti-metastatic, anti-angiogenic, and anti-tumoral activities through protein and histone-deoxyribonucleic acid alterations. In comparison to other ruthenium-based drugs, which have been recently evaluated in clinical trials, RAPTA-C is strikingly competitive, especially when administered in combination with other targeted drugs. In this review, the uniqueness of
RAPTA-C as an anti-cancer chemotherapeutic compared to metal-based drugs under clinical evaluation and those approved by the Food and Drug Administration is emphasized; specifically, comparing the application of RAPTA-C to platinum-based drugs, for example, cisplatin and oxaliplatin, as well as to prominent ruthenium-based compounds, such as NAMI-A imidazolium-trans-tetrachloro(dimethylsulfoxide) imidazoleruthenium(III) and trans-[tetrachlorobis (1Hindazole) ruthenate(III)] (KP1019)/(N)KP1339(N)KP1339 -sodium. Additionally, the possible correlation between RAPTA-C and immune response modulation, as well as potential applications of RAPTA-C in combination with immune therapeutic regimens, is highlighted.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.