1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0335-7457(96)80108-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

IgE spécifiques et histamino-libération

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But HR is costly in terms of both materials (radioisotopes) and laboratory technician time. To date, the real benefit brought by HR remains controversial [3]. Thus, the aim of our study was to perform an easy flow cytometry test for activated basophil detection, without any previous cell separation steps, using a model consisting of whole blood without pretreatment (free of any additional mediators such as IL-3), with a short incubation time in order to provide a method with a reasonable degree of standardization which could be used in different laboratories.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…But HR is costly in terms of both materials (radioisotopes) and laboratory technician time. To date, the real benefit brought by HR remains controversial [3]. Thus, the aim of our study was to perform an easy flow cytometry test for activated basophil detection, without any previous cell separation steps, using a model consisting of whole blood without pretreatment (free of any additional mediators such as IL-3), with a short incubation time in order to provide a method with a reasonable degree of standardization which could be used in different laboratories.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most in vitro tests are focused on basophils, as they are circulating cells (in contrast to mast cells). Nevertheless, technical difficulties such as the low number of circulating basophils, the necessity of leucocyte isolation and the difficulty of measuring very low levels of mediators make these methods unreliable and their diagnostic value controversial, as sensitivity and specificity remain to be clearly defined [1][2][3][4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%