1991
DOI: 10.1080/1120009x.1991.11739115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ifosfamide and Etoposide Salvage Treatment in Advanced Ovarian Cancer

Abstract: Twelve FIGO stage III-IV ovarian cancer patients progressing or relapsing after primary cisplatin-containing combination chemotherapy were treated with ifosfamide and etoposide. Only patients with clinically evaluable disease entered the trial. The 12 patients received a median number of 3 courses (range 1-6). No complete or partial response and two disease stabilizations were observed. Ten patients progressed on therapy. The combination of ifosfamide and etoposide does not appear to be an effective salvage tr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Three of these phase II trials used IV etoposide (19-21), while the other two used oral etoposide (22, 23). Bruzzone et al (20) study resulted in no responses in 12 patients progressing or relapsing after primary cisplatin-containing combination, Trope et al (21) obtained the following results; in 29 patients who received cisplatin as first-line and were deemed to be platinum-resistant, used ETI regimen same dose to ours, RR was 21%, the median time to disease progression was 6 months. They presumed the response to ETI was independent of prior response to first-line cisplatin-based chemotherapy, since there is no cross-resistance between ETI regimen and cisplatin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Three of these phase II trials used IV etoposide (19-21), while the other two used oral etoposide (22, 23). Bruzzone et al (20) study resulted in no responses in 12 patients progressing or relapsing after primary cisplatin-containing combination, Trope et al (21) obtained the following results; in 29 patients who received cisplatin as first-line and were deemed to be platinum-resistant, used ETI regimen same dose to ours, RR was 21%, the median time to disease progression was 6 months. They presumed the response to ETI was independent of prior response to first-line cisplatin-based chemotherapy, since there is no cross-resistance between ETI regimen and cisplatin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…In this condition, we can expect 34.5% RR and 9.2 months of median survival. Several reports including ours have been published on ETI regimen in recurrent EOC [13,[23][24][25][26]. It has been reviewed by Kang et al [14] Most of them used IV etoposide and ifosfmaide, but 2 investigators used oral etoposide and IV ifosfamide.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…17 These two agents in the same or different combinations have also shown activity in relapsed pediatric solid tumors. 18 For relapsed ovarian tumors, combining the two agents together resulted in no responses in one Italian study, 22 whereas two other phase II trials reported 21% and 26% response rate. 23,24 Two of these phase II trials used intravenous etoposide, 22,23 while the recent one 24 used oral etoposide as we did in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%