“…There are other reasons for studying ECRs than their newness or youthfulness: - ECRs typically constitute the largest body of researchers in the higher education sector (Jones, ) and in some countries, such as China, can be counted in the tens of millions (see www.most.gov.cn/kjtj/201803/P020180305380063904804.pdf in Chinese).
- ECRs are recognized as being among the most creative and energetic researchers and, as such, constitute a vast pool of global talent that can play a central role in knowledge economies (Friesenhahn & Beaudry, ).
- There are their millennial beliefs about openness, sharing, and transparency (Anderson & Rainie, ; Taylor & Keeter, ), which apply across all nationalities (Schewe et al, ), and ECRs can conceivably be the harbingers of disruptive change in research and innovation systems according to Boulton () and LERU ().
- They provide a powerful lens through which to investigate the scholarly communications system because they are the research workhorses. Thus, our data show that they are authors; reviewers (usually as proxies for their mentors); and sometimes sit on editorial boards and lead research groups and undertake most of the fundamentals, such as searching, discovery, and referencing.
…”