‘If you look at the sky you step in sh*t’: horizons of possibility and migration from Serbia

Abstract

Following nearly two decades of wartime ‘entrapment’, in 2009 the conditions of possibility for mobility fundamentally changed for Serbian citizens. Of both symbolic and material consequence, Serbia’s return to respectable geopolitical standing also marked a shift toward more nuanced stance‐taking in relation to mobility – at least for members of an urban, educated generation who have taken advantage of renewed opportunities to travel. In this article, I explore the real and symbolic geographies invoked by young potential migrants in talk of leaving and staying in Serbia. I read mobility narratives as proxies for commentary on a host of other political and socio‐economic issues, drawing attention to the role of international travel in the construction of imaginary yet authoritative ‘contrapuntal’ lives lived elsewhere. I show how such imaginaries both colour how potential and return migrants narrate their everyday navigations in the ‘here and now’ and give moral weight to migratory aspirations for, and experiences of, lives lived in the ‘then and there’. In unpacking the emic terms ‘negative selection’ and perspektiva, I argue that the foundational motif of these varied imaginaries is a deep investment in the ideology of meritocracy, a morally inflected register for the articulation of aspiration as well as critique.

Exquisite Corpses and backward glances: European social anthropology 2019

“…The depth of analysis encompasses embedded currents across the fractures of the migrant experience and phenomenon. The emic imaginaries that drive longing and aspiration in the minds and hearts of prospective socio‐economic migrants before they leave (Johnson 2019) are explored in Serbia. The contrary emic concept of integration that meets migrants once they become immigrants in their country of final destination (Rytter 2018) is exposed in Denmark, where integration is revealed as an ‘open signifier’ (Laclau 1996) and is always embedded in specific national social imaginaries, nested in a vocabulary of power, the prerogative of the state and the indigenous majority population, objectifying, stigmatising and excluding immigrants from those imaginaries.…”