2016
DOI: 10.5964/ejop.v12i4.984
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

If stigmatized, self-esteem is not enough: Effects of sexism, self-esteem and social identity on leadership aspiration

Abstract: Ambivalent sexism has many pernicious consequences. Since gender stereotypes also affect leadership roles, the present research investigated the effects of ambivalent sexism on envisioning oneself as a leader. Our studies tested the influence of sexist attitudes (toward women – Study 1 – and men – Study 2) on leadership aspiration, taking into account the interaction among ambivalent attitudes, personal characteristics (e.g. self-esteem), and group processes (e.g. level of identification with gender). Specific… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, an explicit hostile attitude toward women encompasses the endorsement of all the rape myths, whereas benevolence toward men weakens the offender's fault. These findings are in line with literature that has largely showed many pernicious effects of sexism (e.g., Barreto & Ellemers, 2005;Canto et al, 2014;Fedi & Rollero, 2016), but they also underline the necessity of differentiating the dimensions of ambivalent sexism. Indeed, if it is well established that benevolence and hostility toward both men and women are a complementary set of gender-traditional stereotypes which reinforce the status quo (Glick et al, 2004), more attention should be paid to the role each dimension can play in foster victim blaming and offender's justification in case of rape.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In other words, an explicit hostile attitude toward women encompasses the endorsement of all the rape myths, whereas benevolence toward men weakens the offender's fault. These findings are in line with literature that has largely showed many pernicious effects of sexism (e.g., Barreto & Ellemers, 2005;Canto et al, 2014;Fedi & Rollero, 2016), but they also underline the necessity of differentiating the dimensions of ambivalent sexism. Indeed, if it is well established that benevolence and hostility toward both men and women are a complementary set of gender-traditional stereotypes which reinforce the status quo (Glick et al, 2004), more attention should be paid to the role each dimension can play in foster victim blaming and offender's justification in case of rape.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Self-esteem seems to play an important role in the relationship between individuals and achievements, both real and potential. The results of this study are in line with a number of empirical results that consistently report a positive relationship between selfesteem and leadership [26], between self-esteem and leadership aspirations [11], and research results between psychological variables (self-esteem, self-concept, and internal illusory control) with educational aspirations and job aspirations [14]. Castro & Armitage-Chan [27] found that students with higher confidence and self-esteem were more likely to aspire to realize their plans, then students with higher self-esteem had more positive views about learning, skills development, and educational experience, and experience less stress, all of which can positively influence the pursuit of leadership roles and aspirations for individual education going forward, both of which are dimensions of career aspirations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…They concluded that women high on need for connectedness and self-esteem are more likely to report higher leadership aspirations. Fedi & Rollero (2016) found self-esteem to have a significant main effect on leadership aspirations of both men and women. Dickerson & Taylor (2002) found women high on task-specific self-esteem to show a greater selection of as well as interest in completing leadership tasks, while those low on it tend to select themselves out of leadership roles or positions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%