If Mr Nottebohm had a golden passport: a study of the obligations for third countries under international law regarding citizenships-for-sale

Abstract

When discussing ‘golden passports’, modern-day academics and practitioners frequently and erroneously cite Nottebohm to claim that international law demands a ‘genuine link’ to grant nationality. Despite Nottebohm's central status in international law, such a view misrepresents the ruling of the majority of the International Court of Justice in the 1955 case. Nottebohm does indeed open very effective avenues to address some of the legal issues derived from citizenship-for-sale schemes, but not as is often assumed. This article reflects instead on Nottebohm's insightful distinction between the competence to grant a nationality, and the effects due under international law norms to that new nationality by third States. On that basis, the article proposes a number of options working within the bounds of international and EU law to protect those third States from some of the undesired trans-boundary effects of golden passports.

The Evolution of the Incentives for Anti-Corruption Corporate Compliance Programs in the International Legal Order

“…139 None of Villarino, Rose, or WRC included the G20 initiatives within their listings of the IACR. 140 However, I chose to include the G20 in this article because both the OECD and UN have referenced G20 anti-corruption standards in some documents analyzed in this article. Furthermore, G20 actions can significantly stimulate anti-corruption efforts, given that its members represent around 85% of the global Gross Domestic Product (GDP), over 75% of global trade, and about two-thirds of the world's population.…”