2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2014.10.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

If ego depletion cannot be studied using identical tasks, it is not ego depletion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Many extant empirical papers use tasks that have multiple executive control processes engaged, some of which overlap and some of which do not. Therefore, choosing the same task for depletion and subsequent transfer holds these theoretical and biological processes constant (Lange, 2015) and allows one to explore theories of depletion at a more fine-grained level of specificity where transfer is most likely to occur (Thorndike & Woodworth, 1901). We adopted the psychomotor vigilance task because it met these aforementioned requirements and it has been used in studies of vigilant behavior in a diverse set of domains (Dinges & Powell, 1985).…”
Section: The Current Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many extant empirical papers use tasks that have multiple executive control processes engaged, some of which overlap and some of which do not. Therefore, choosing the same task for depletion and subsequent transfer holds these theoretical and biological processes constant (Lange, 2015) and allows one to explore theories of depletion at a more fine-grained level of specificity where transfer is most likely to occur (Thorndike & Woodworth, 1901). We adopted the psychomotor vigilance task because it met these aforementioned requirements and it has been used in studies of vigilant behavior in a diverse set of domains (Dinges & Powell, 1985).…”
Section: The Current Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, there is some dispute as to the precise nature of the resource, and provide alternative explanations (Beedie & Lane, 2011;Inzlicht & Schmeichel, 2012;Inzlicht, Schmeichel, & Macrae, 2014) or debate whether it is an effect at all (Carter & McCullough, 2013b;Carter & McCullough, 2014;Hagger & Chatzisarantis, 2014b). Others have contended that it has a physiological analogue (Gailliot et al, 2007), while others dispute this and indicate that the effect may be perceptual (Carter & McCullough, 2013a;Chatzisarantis & Hagger, 2015a, 2015bLange, 2015;Lange & Eggert, 2014). Moreover, some have conceptualized it as a set of beliefs (Job, Dweck, & Walton, 2010), motivation (Muraven & Slessareva, 2003) or capacity for resource allocation (Beedie & Lane, 2011;Inzlicht & Schmeichel, 2012).…”
Section: Common Elementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To examine the impact of ego depletion researchers typically adopt the sequential task paradigm in which participants are asked to perform at least two unrelated tasks thought to consume self‐control (Lange, 2015). We refer to these two tasks as the depleting (manipulation) task and the outcome task, respectively.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%