2014
DOI: 10.1111/anae.12980
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

If a little bit is wrong, how much is alright? Interpreting the significance of small numerators in clinical trials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, ours was a more challenging patient population with distorted airway anatomy. Larger studies would refine the confidence intervals for failure .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, ours was a more challenging patient population with distorted airway anatomy. Larger studies would refine the confidence intervals for failure .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two thirds of the TT caseload had their TT removed awake. It is reassuring that no deaths were reported under GA but the upper 95% confidence interval of zero in this series is 3 (of 2695) which equates to approximately 1.1 per thousand (9).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Almost 90% of children (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15) year) were classed as ASA 1 or 2 and, in these, the substantial majority underwent routine nonurgent ENT, dental, orthopedics & trauma, or general surgery procedures; 65% were 'day cases'. One in six children were managed outside operating theater sites compared with one in 12 adults.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1/317 soit 0,31 %) et proches de l'incidence de douleurs thoraciques (six cas de douleurs thoraciques sur 240 patientes incluse dans trois études soit 2,5 %) rapportées par l'équipe de Toronto. [8][9][10] En utilisant l'approximation proposée par Beach et Sites dans le calcul de la borne supérieure de l'intervalle de confiance (IC)95 % en cas d'événement rares, 20 nous retrouvons un IC95 % de 3/295 (1,01 %), proche de 3/317 (0,95 %) chez Dansereau et 3/240 (1,25 %) dans l'équipe de Toronto. Même si ce seul cas rapporté dans notre établissement sur un an prête à discussion, car des phénomènes mineurs de douleurs thoraciques transitoires peuvent avoir été négligées par d'autres anesthésistes, le fait d'attirer l'attention sur ce sujet peut participer au renforcement de la vigilance des praticiens et des autorités sanitaires dans le suivi des effets secondaires induits par les nouvelles molécules mises sur le marché.…”
Section: Commentaireunclassified