2021
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.4817875
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

IEA Wind TCP Task 29, Phase IV: Detailed Aerodynamics of Wind Turbines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet, only the combination of inflow and load measurement allows for a clear assessment of actuator or BEM-based turbine models in waked inflow conditions. We can therefore highly recommend similar setups for future measurements campaigns even though expensive and challenging to calibrate [33]. Further valuable additions can be strain gauges on the tower, enabling reference estimations of the overall thrust force.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Yet, only the combination of inflow and load measurement allows for a clear assessment of actuator or BEM-based turbine models in waked inflow conditions. We can therefore highly recommend similar setups for future measurements campaigns even though expensive and challenging to calibrate [33]. Further valuable additions can be strain gauges on the tower, enabling reference estimations of the overall thrust force.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, it should be mentioned that selected cases of the DanAero experiment investigated within Task 29 showed inconsistencies when comparing measurements of the pressure forces and bending moments; see Ref. [33]. A small bias in the measured F n can thus not be fully ruled out.…”
Section: Power and Loads Of The Downstream Turbinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the case of straight blades, previous studies have illustrated that the coupling factor is able to be automatically adjusted during the computation. Indeed, the dynamic response of the coupled model shows improved agreement with higher-fidelity models and experiments, when compared to the BEM method (Pirrung et al, 2017a;Schepers et al, 2021). However, the current method of coupling the near-and far-wake model is implicitly based on the assumption that the blade is straight and the rotor is planar.…”
Section: Far-wake Model and Coupling Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The code benefits from a long validation and verification history (e.g. [15,16,17,18]), and it can be used either in standalone mode for aerodynamic calculations on rigid turbines or coupled to an aeroelastic software for loadcase calculations. Two aerodynamic models are currently implemented in AM: a BEM method; and a higherfidelity FVW code known as AWSM [19].…”
Section: Tno Aeromodule: Awsm and Standard Bem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%