2005
DOI: 10.1080/01440360500034420
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Idiots, lunatics and the royal prerogative in early Tudor England

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Royalty features in three other studies. Mcglynn examines the royal prerogative of wardship over the insane, finding that families often retained control over them (and their property). Houlbrooke explores royal mourning in the Tudor and early Stuart period.…”
Section: (Iii) 1500–1700
 Henry French
 University Of Exetermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Royalty features in three other studies. Mcglynn examines the royal prerogative of wardship over the insane, finding that families often retained control over them (and their property). Houlbrooke explores royal mourning in the Tudor and early Stuart period.…”
Section: (Iii) 1500–1700
 Henry French
 University Of Exetermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Children and adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) may encounter the criminal justice system in one or more of several ways. The joint Position Statement on the Criminal Justice System by the Arc of the United States and the American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (The Arc, 2018) currently identifies the following five: people with ID as victims, (Prerogativa Regis) drew a legal distinction between ID and mental illness and made the king responsible for the care of "idiots and lunatics" in order to safeguard them from exploitation and to protect their property (McGlynn, 2005). Wickham (2002) found that, contrary to Scheerenberger's (1983) account, very little documentation exists regarding the role of idiots in colonial America.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%