2013
DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/nos317
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

IDH/MGMT-driven molecular classification of low-grade glioma is a strong predictor for long-term survival

Abstract: By integrating networks of activated molecular glioma pathways, the model based on genotype better predicts prognosis than histology and, therefore, provides a more reliable tool for standardizing future treatment strategies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

8
105
1
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 164 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
8
105
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with prior analysis [5], it was observed in our cohort that the presence of IDH1 mutation status was associated with better OS and PFS (3-year OS for IDH1 (n=7) vs. no IDH1 (n=6): 100% vs. 21%, 3-year PFS for IDH1 (n=7) vs. no IDH1 (n=6): 67% vs. 0%). With respect to 1p19q deletion status, overall survival was improved but was not significantly different [22]. Despite previous studies that indicate that median survival in patients with diagnosed 1p and 19q deletion is twice as long in comparison with patients in whom no deletion was observed, our study did not find such a significant difference [11].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 95%
“…Consistent with prior analysis [5], it was observed in our cohort that the presence of IDH1 mutation status was associated with better OS and PFS (3-year OS for IDH1 (n=7) vs. no IDH1 (n=6): 100% vs. 21%, 3-year PFS for IDH1 (n=7) vs. no IDH1 (n=6): 67% vs. 0%). With respect to 1p19q deletion status, overall survival was improved but was not significantly different [22]. Despite previous studies that indicate that median survival in patients with diagnosed 1p and 19q deletion is twice as long in comparison with patients in whom no deletion was observed, our study did not find such a significant difference [11].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 95%
“…The exact role that IDH1 mutations serve in neoplasia is not fully understood, however it has been demonstrated that presence of a heterozygous R132H mutation induces genome-wide alterations in DNA methylation, leading to hypermethylation and hypomethylation (16,17). IDH1 mutations are associated with MGMT and CRBP1 promoter methylation in certain brain tumors (18)(19)(20)(21). However, this association was not observed in the periosteal chondroma tissue specimens in the present study, since none of them possessed methylated MGMT or CRBP1 promoters, as determined using the MSP methodology (11,12).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, assessment of O 6 -DNA methylguanine-methyltransferase (MGMT) methylation status, which has been previously associated with benefit to therapy with TMZ, 13 was not evaluated in this study as a potential prognostic factor. However, the presence of MGMT methylation has been found to be highly correlated with IDH mutational status 39 (84% of patients with IDH mutation were MGMT RT, radiotherapy; UCSF, University of California, San Francisco; GTR, gross total resection; STR, subtotal resection; NR, not reached. methylated), so MGMT status would likely provide minimal additional prognostic information.…”
Section: Neurooncologymentioning
confidence: 99%