Ideology after the end of ideology. China and the quest for autocratic legitimation

Holbig, Heike

doi:10.1080/13510347.2013.738862

Cited by 82 publications

(35 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Gerschewski (2013) identifies three pillars of authoritarian regime stabilization mechanisms: repression, co-optation, and legitimation, with all three pillars evident in Russian pasportizatsiya strategies within Crimea. While repressive elements of authoritarian regimes are directed at the larger population, much of the research conducted into co-optation mechanisms have predominately dealt with this at an elite level (Gandhi & Przeworski, 2007;Holbig, 2013;Kailitz, 2013;Magaloni, 2008;Reuter & Robertson, 2015). However, co-optation need not be a phenomenon exclusively involving elites nor is it uniform phenomenon.…”

Section: Contextualizing Pasportizatsiyamentioning

confidence: 99%

Authoritarian regime stabilization through legitimation, popular co-optation, and exclusion: Russianpasportizatsiyastrategies in Crimea

Wrighton

2017

Globalizations

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the spring of 2014, Russian authorities distributed, rapidly and on mass, Russian passports to their newly and controversially acquired citizens within Crimea. This passport distribution strategy, or pasportizatsiya, can be seen as a continuation of the Soviet practice which was conducted to spatially control a population. In focusing on the most contemporary instance of this practice, this paper asks: how and why did pasportizatsiya take place in Crimea? The research involved a processed-focused empirical data collection, consisting of interviews conducted with Crimeans and NGO representatives. The article finds that distribution of Russian passports to Ukrainian citizens in Crimea provided the Russian Federation with a regime stabilization mechanism, through the population within their new and controversially acquired territorial borders.

show abstract

Section: Contextualizing Pasportizatsiyamentioning

confidence: 99%

Authoritarian regime stabilization through legitimation, popular co-optation, and exclusion: Russianpasportizatsiyastrategies in Crimea

Wrighton

2017

Globalizations

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…al. 2014;Holbig 2013;Kailitz 2013;Hoffmann 2011). The research on state feminism suggests that the policies that authoritarian regimes adopt in the area of women's rights and gender politics can form part of each of these specific legitimation strategies.…”

Section: Pattern 1: Using Women's Rights and Gender Politics As An Aumentioning

confidence: 99%

“…al. 2014;Holbig 2013;Kailitz 2013;Hoffmann 2011). Another strand of research has dealt with the co-optation mechanisms, such as patronclient networks and arrangements for selective political inclusion, that can be used to make non-democratic rule more resilient (e.g.…”

Section: Authoritarian Resilience and State Feminism: Theoretical Insmentioning

confidence: 99%

Gender Politics, Authoritarian Regime Resilience, and the Role of Civil Society in Algeria and Mozambique

Lorch

Bunk

2016

SSRN Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. Terms of use: Documents in

show abstract

“…It serves as a belief system, which conveys a particular worldview and an outlook on an ideal society, and as the guide to the CPC's actions, which enables the party-state to legitimize and operationalize various practices, institutions, and organizations [2,7,8]. Propaganda is the Blife blood^of the Chinese party-state as it remains one of the key means by which it secures popular support, which in turn is the source of the CPC's authority to govern in the post-revolutionary era ( [1], 8).…”

Section: Ideology Propaganda and Political Discourse In Contemporarmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…[4,11,19,20]). It is the CPC's simultaneous ability to modernize and adapt, as well as its adherence to Leninist ideological and organizational principles, which has engendered a neo-socialist system where the combination of centralization, strengthening, and the adoption of a selective retreat of the party-state has played a crucial role in guaranteeing both economic growth and social stability ( [15], [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. The state-centered paradigm, therefore, seems to remain the most valid one for the study of Chinese contemporary politics [6].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Introduction: Ideology, Propaganda, and Political Discourse in the Xi Jinping Era

Klimeš

Marinelli

2018

J OF CHIN POLIT SCI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The ideology, propaganda, and political discourse of the Communist Party of China (CPC) have continued to function as key elements of the political system of the People's Republic of China (PRC) in the post-Maoist period since 1978. In the first term of the Xi Jinping leadership (2012)(2013)(2014)(2015)(2016)(2017), the CPC, for instance, elaborated on its guiding ideological concepts, devised inventive ideational framings of phenomena usually perceived as tangible (such as the BNew Normal^), engaged in complex intellectual debates on crucial topics (such as Beco-civilization^), intensified and diversified its argumentation patterns and discursive strategies, and consolidated ideational governance over some citizens' individual values, beliefs, and loyalties. Furthermore, it is often no longer possible to differentiate between the CPC's internal and external propaganda, as seemingly exclusively domestic ideational and discursive issues increasingly correlate with international phenomena. However, the trends in the Xi era do not present paradigmatic shifts, but rather an overall reassertion-cuminnovation of previous Maoist and post-Maoist uses of ideology, propaganda, and political discourse, primarily aiming at strengthening one-party rule.

show abstract

Ideology after the end of ideology. China and the quest for autocratic legitimation

Cited by 82 publications

References 22 publications

Authoritarian regime stabilization through legitimation, popular co-optation, and exclusion: Russianpasportizatsiyastrategies in Crimea

Authoritarian regime stabilization through legitimation, popular co-optation, and exclusion: Russianpasportizatsiyastrategies in Crimea

Gender Politics, Authoritarian Regime Resilience, and the Role of Civil Society in Algeria and Mozambique

Introduction: Ideology, Propaganda, and Political Discourse in the Xi Jinping Era

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About