1976
DOI: 10.2307/2025891
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identity Statements and Microreductions

Abstract: JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(Cf. Enc [95], Ager et al [81].) But despite its popularity in the literature, it is much less obvious whether, and how, temperature is to be identified as mean molecular kinetic energy, precisely because of the complexities of the relationship.…”
Section: §4 the Role Of Identity: General Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…(Cf. Enc [95], Ager et al [81].) But despite its popularity in the literature, it is much less obvious whether, and how, temperature is to be identified as mean molecular kinetic energy, precisely because of the complexities of the relationship.…”
Section: §4 the Role Of Identity: General Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Causey, we have seen, makes much of the superiority of identities in reduction on the grounds that they themselves need no explanation, indeed cannot be explained. Others, most interestingly Enc [95], have disputed these latter claims. Enc invites consideration of the following case:…”
Section: ) §5 Identity and Explanationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Just what the nature of bridge laws is is a problem which has exercised philosophers considerably (see Causey 1972 andEnc 1976), but most of that debate can be ignored here. Whatever a bridge law is, it must allow for the derivation of something in the reduced science from something in the reducing science.…”
Section: IIImentioning
confidence: 99%