2010
DOI: 10.1080/15283481003711684
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identity Process and Transformative Pedagogy: Teachers as Agents of Identity Formation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
35
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Sociologists have certainly demonstrated that identities can be powerfully conferred through social structure and educational institutions (e.g., Côté, 1996;Stets & Burke, 2003). However, IdEd is based on the assertion that individuals also have a meaningful measure of initiative and autonomy vis-à-vis identity processes and contents (see Holland, Lachicotte, Skinner, & Cain, 1998;Lightfoot & Valsiner, 1992;Martin, 2007), that they can take part in negotiating and constructing their own identity, and that this self-defining agency can and should be mediated and strengthened in schools (Alexander, 2005;Harrell-Levy & Kerpelman, 2010;Kahne & Sporte, 2008;Youniss & Hart, 2005). Recognizing both the student's agency regarding selfdefinition and the influence of social structure through social institutions including schools is based on the understanding of identity as a psychosocial construct, a view endorsed by classic Eriksonian formulations of identity and by postmodern views of identity (Côté & Levine, 2002;Schachter, 2005b).…”
Section: Definitionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Sociologists have certainly demonstrated that identities can be powerfully conferred through social structure and educational institutions (e.g., Côté, 1996;Stets & Burke, 2003). However, IdEd is based on the assertion that individuals also have a meaningful measure of initiative and autonomy vis-à-vis identity processes and contents (see Holland, Lachicotte, Skinner, & Cain, 1998;Lightfoot & Valsiner, 1992;Martin, 2007), that they can take part in negotiating and constructing their own identity, and that this self-defining agency can and should be mediated and strengthened in schools (Alexander, 2005;Harrell-Levy & Kerpelman, 2010;Kahne & Sporte, 2008;Youniss & Hart, 2005). Recognizing both the student's agency regarding selfdefinition and the influence of social structure through social institutions including schools is based on the understanding of identity as a psychosocial construct, a view endorsed by classic Eriksonian formulations of identity and by postmodern views of identity (Côté & Levine, 2002;Schachter, 2005b).…”
Section: Definitionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The implementation of transformative practices may allow “students' intelligence to be activated in ways that potentially challenge the societal status quo” (Cummins, , p.247), and one of its primary benefits is that it enables learners to positively affirm their identities (Harrell‐Levy and Kerpelman, , p. 78). Transformative pedagogy cannot necessarily break the cyclic relations of language, privilege and power, but it may empower the students to enter the discourse and develop voices that can be heard in wider society (Delpit, , p. 296).…”
Section: Bourdieu Language and Powermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a student-centred pedagogy that emphasises the mutual learning between educator and student (Elenes 2001;Meyers 2008;Harrell-Levy and Kerpelman 2010).…”
Section: Film and Transformative Pedagogymentioning
confidence: 99%