Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences 2015
DOI: 10.1002/9781118900772.etrds0172
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identity Fusion

Abstract: Identity fusion represents a new form of alignment with groups that motivates personally costly, pro‐group behaviors. The approach posits that fused individuals experience a visceral sense of “oneness” with a group, wherein their personal self (characteristics of individuals that make them unique) joins with a social self (characteristics of individuals that align them with groups). Research has identified several cognitive and affective mechanisms (e.g., sense of agency, invulnerability, familial ties) unique… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0
5

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
12
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Sports fandom, particularly football, is an especially relevant context in which to investigate the relationship between fusion and extreme pro-group behaviours, such as physical violence because: (a) it appears globally; (b) there is substantial variation in behaviour among fans, e.g. between so called ‘scarfers’ and ‘hooligans’; (c) it extends previous research on the relationship between identification and outgroup hostility in sports fans (Donahue and Wann, 2009; Wann et al, 1999); and (d) it extends previous fusion research on military, paramilitary and radical groups (Buhrmester and Swann, 2015).…”
Section: Perspectives On Fan Violencesupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Sports fandom, particularly football, is an especially relevant context in which to investigate the relationship between fusion and extreme pro-group behaviours, such as physical violence because: (a) it appears globally; (b) there is substantial variation in behaviour among fans, e.g. between so called ‘scarfers’ and ‘hooligans’; (c) it extends previous research on the relationship between identification and outgroup hostility in sports fans (Donahue and Wann, 2009; Wann et al, 1999); and (d) it extends previous fusion research on military, paramilitary and radical groups (Buhrmester and Swann, 2015).…”
Section: Perspectives On Fan Violencesupporting
confidence: 70%
“…These initial attempts to find empirical foundations for the theory as well as to articulate the key overlaps and differences between identity fusion and group identification produced several reviews mainly focused on how the findings supported each of the four principles (Buhrmester & Swann, 2015; Fredman et al, 2015; Gómez & Vázquez, 2015; Swann & Buhrmester, 2015, see Table 1 for a summary).…”
Section: Identity Fusion Theory Before 2015mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While some research has explored aspects of military identity (Griffith, 2002; Johansen, Laberg, & Martinussen, 2014; Lancaster & Hart, 2015) and military personnel are often used as anecdotal examples of fusion, no research has examined the role of fusion specifically in U.S. military members and veterans. This lack of empirical study is particularly surprising given that two of the strongest predictors of fusion: negative shared experiences (Jong et al, 2015) and performing physical rituals together (Buhrmester & Swann, 2015) are primary characteristics of military service.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%