2017
DOI: 10.1080/10228195.2017.1367956
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identity Construction and Norms of Practice among Bilingual Ngoni in Rural Tanzania

Tove Rosendal
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On a general note, it indicated an undervalued Ngoni culture. A later study confirmed that the Ngoni identity is rather weak (Rosendal 2017).…”
Section: Earlier Researchan African Perspectivementioning
confidence: 70%
“…On a general note, it indicated an undervalued Ngoni culture. A later study confirmed that the Ngoni identity is rather weak (Rosendal 2017).…”
Section: Earlier Researchan African Perspectivementioning
confidence: 70%
“…These studies crossed ethnic and national borders considering them to be elusive since people are no longer restricted to the confines of their regional and national boundaries. Given the complexities of current day multilingual contexts, it is not surprising that ethnic and national classification of identities are challenged, and languages are regarded as being fluid and dynamic rather than entities that can be classified into separate and discrete categories (Casas, 2008;Kebede, 2017;Rosendal, 2017).…”
Section: Code-switching and Identitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason for merging the local and interactional layers is that there exist overlaps and fine differences between the two, hence blurring the categories. This is why many studies (e.g., Casas, 2008;Lamb, 2009;Rosendal, 2017) have used two major categories, the micro and macro. In this way, the micro world of interaction refers to the broader world of the speakers.…”
Section: Code-switching and Identitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The phenomenon of identity has been studied extensively particularly in areas such as sociology, psychology, anthropology, sociolinguistics, discourse analysis, cultural and communication studies. However, these researchers (Labov, 1966;Trudgill, 1974;Milroy & Milroy, 1978;Milroy, 1980;Mendoza-Denton, 2002;Bucholtz& Hall, 2005;Gonzales, 2009;Burnett (2017); Mora, 2017;Rosendal, 2017;Gündüz, 2017) who have studied this phenomenon in these fields suggest that the construction of identity through communication needs a separate investigation through the contemporary lens applied for the digital era. Therefore, this research focuses particularly on the strategies employed for constructing different identities such as regional, gender, tribal, religious through communication.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%