2017
DOI: 10.1080/03057925.2017.1292847
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identity as immunology: history teaching in two ethnonational borders of Europe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As evidenced by several debates which took place in Cyprus during the last decades these narratives remain dominant and do not allow space for the Cyprocentric ones that challenge them (see for example Perikleous, 2015a;Onurkan-Samani & Tarhan, 2017). Klerides and Zembylas (2011) describe this phenomenon as a form of immunology where Cyprocentric narratives are prevented from passing the border of history textbooks in order to threaten ethnocentric identities. We suggest that the phenomenon goes beyond textbooks and that this imaginary border includes the narratives prescribed by curricular texts and educational policies too.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As evidenced by several debates which took place in Cyprus during the last decades these narratives remain dominant and do not allow space for the Cyprocentric ones that challenge them (see for example Perikleous, 2015a;Onurkan-Samani & Tarhan, 2017). Klerides and Zembylas (2011) describe this phenomenon as a form of immunology where Cyprocentric narratives are prevented from passing the border of history textbooks in order to threaten ethnocentric identities. We suggest that the phenomenon goes beyond textbooks and that this imaginary border includes the narratives prescribed by curricular texts and educational policies too.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in a case of conflict, where school curricula and teaching serve a notion of citizenship that is coterminous with a homogenous culture and nation, history teaching might produce xenophobia, not only towards the Turkish-Cypriot community, but also towards non-dominant groups, such as minorities, immigrants, and refugees (Hajisoteriou, 2011). It is in divided societies where history teaching should be the vehicle for the promotion of peace, reconciliation, and mutual respect and understanding, not only between the two major communities, but also with other social groups such as minorities, immigrants, and refugees (Klerides, 2016;Klerides and Zembylas, 2017). To this end, past research highlights the importance of school history in building interculturally-competent citizens (Leontsinis, 2007;Harris, 2013;Nordgren and Johansson, 2015;Nordgren, 2017;Solomou et al, 2019), as concept that we further discuss below.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…This is a central part of several dilemmas when teaching and learning the near past. This review identifies multiple cases in which critical thinking and enquiry approaches are challenged by the context of war and trauma and possibly the objective of history to promote the vision of the nation (Bellino 2015;Glanvill-Miller 2017;Klerides and Zembylas 2017;Korostelina 2015;McCully 2012;Shepler and Williams 2017).…”
Section: Multiple Narrativesmentioning
confidence: 99%